| Autor: |
Hosier GW; Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada., Hakam N; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA., Hamouche F; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA., Cortez X; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA., Charondo L; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA., Yang H; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA., Chan C; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA., Chang K; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA., Unno R; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA., Sui W; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA., Bayne DB; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA., Stoller ML; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA., Chi T; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
Introduction: Outcomes after ultrasound-only percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), in which no fluoroscopy is used, are not well known. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes of ultrasound-only and fluoroscopy-directed PCNL. Materials and Methods: Prospectively collected data from the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter database were reviewed for all patients who underwent PCNL at one academic center from 2015 to 2021. Primary outcomes were complications and stone-free rates (no residual fragments ≥3 mm). Results: Of the 141 patients who underwent ultrasound-only PCNL and 147 who underwent fluoroscopy-directed PCNL, there was no difference in complication rates (15% vs 16%, p = 0.87) or stone-free status (71% vs 65%, p = 0.72), respectively. After adjusting for body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), stone size, and stone complexity by Guy score, ultrasound-only PCNL was not associated with any increased odds of complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-1.6, p = 0.41) or residual stone fragments ≥3 mm (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.5-1.9, p = 0.972) compared with fluoroscopy-directed PCNL. Ultrasound-only PCNL was associated with shorter operative time (median 99.5 vs 126 minutes, p < 0.001), and the use of ultrasound remained a significant predictor of short operative time (<100 minutes) after controlling for supine positioning, stone size, and stone complexity by Guy score (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.01-5.29, p = 0.048). Patients in the ultrasound-only group were spared a mean radiation exposure dose of 10 mGy per procedure. Conclusions: Ultrasound-only PCNL is safe and achieves similar stone-free rates compared with fluoroscopy-directed PCNL with the added benefit of avoidance of radiation. |
