Greater traditionalism predicts COVID-19 precautionary behaviors across 27 societies.

Autor: Samore T; Department of Anthropology, Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. theo.samore@gmail.com., Fessler DMT; Department of Anthropology, Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture, Bedari Kindness Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA., Sparks AM, Holbrook C; Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA, 95343, USA., Aarøe L; Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark., Baeza CG; Laboratorio de Evolución y Relaciones Interpersonales, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile., Barbato MT; Laboratorio de Evolución y Relaciones Interpersonales, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile., Barclay P; Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada., Berniūnas R; Institute of Psychology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania., Contreras-Garduño J; Escuela Nacional de Estudio Superiores, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Unidad Morelia, 58190, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico., Costa-Neves B; Lisbon Medical School, University of Lisbon, 1649-028, Lisbon, Portugal.; Centro Hospitalar Psiquiátrico de Lisboa, 1749-002, Lisbon, Portugal., Del Pilar Grazioso M; Centro Integral de Psicología Aplicada, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, 01015, Guatemala.; Proyecto Aiglé Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala., Elmas P; Department of Psychology, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey., Fedor P; Department of Environmental Ecology and Landscape Management, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, 842 15, Bratislava, Slovakia., Fernandez AM; Laboratorio de Evolución y Relaciones Interpersonales, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile., Fernández-Morales R; Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad Rafael Landivár, Guatemala City, 01016, Guatemala.; Departamento de Psicología, Universidad Francisco Marroquín, Guatemala City, Guatemala., Garcia-Marques L; CICPsi Research Center for Psychological Science, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.; School of Psychology, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal., Giraldo-Perez P; The School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand., Gul P; Department of Sustainable Health, University of Groningen, Campus Fryslân, Groningen, The Netherlands., Habacht F; Division of Psychological Methodology, Department of Psychology and Psychodynamics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria., Hasan Y; Psychology Program, Department of Social Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, 2713, Doha, Qatar., Hernandez EJ; College of Arts and Sciences, Partido State University, Goa, 4422, Camarines Sur, Philippines., Jarmakowski T; Institute of Psychology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, 87-100, Toruń, Poland., Kamble S; Department of Psychology, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka, 580003, India., Kameda T; Department of Social Psychology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.; Brain Science Institute, Tamagawa University, Tokyo, 194-8610, Japan.; Center for Experimental Research in Social Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0810, Japan., Kim B; Department of Psychology, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea., Kupfer TR; Department of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG1 4FQ, UK., Kurita M; Department of Social Psychology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan., Li NP; School of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore, 188065, Singapore., Lu J; School of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, 518172, China., Luberti FR; Department of Psychology, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, P1B 8L7, Canada., Maegli MA; Department of Psychology, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, 01015, Guatemala., Mejia M; Proyecto Aiglé Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala., Morvinski C; Department of Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel., Naito A; Department of Social Psychology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, 102-0083, Japan., Ng'ang'a A; Lazaridis School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3C5, Canada., de Oliveira AN; Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada., Posner DN; Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA., Prokop P; Department of Environmental Ecology and Landscape Management, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, 842 15, Bratislava, Slovakia.; Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 845 06, Bratislava, Slovakia., Shani Y; Coller School of Management, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel., Solorzano WOP; Department of Psychology, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, 01015, Guatemala., Stieger S; Division of Psychological Methodology, Department of Psychology and Psychodynamics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria., Suryani AO; Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, 12930, Indonesia., Tan LKL; School of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore, 188065, Singapore., Tybur JM; Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands., Viciana H; Departamento de Filosofía y Lógica y Filosofía de la Ciencia, Universidad de Sevilla, 41018, Seville, Spain., Visine A; L'Institut Agro Montpellier, 34060, Montpellier, France., Wang J; School of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, 518172, China., Wang XT; School of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, 518172, China.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2023 Apr 11; Vol. 13 (1), pp. 4969. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Apr 11.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29655-0
Abstrakt: People vary both in their embrace of their society's traditions, and in their perception of hazards as salient and necessitating a response. Over evolutionary time, traditions have offered avenues for addressing hazards, plausibly resulting in linkages between orientations toward tradition and orientations toward danger. Emerging research documents connections between traditionalism and threat responsivity, including pathogen-avoidance motivations. Additionally, because hazard-mitigating behaviors can conflict with competing priorities, associations between traditionalism and pathogen avoidance may hinge on contextually contingent tradeoffs. The COVID-19 pandemic provides a real-world test of the posited relationship between traditionalism and hazard avoidance. Across 27 societies (N = 7844), we find that, in a majority of countries, individuals' endorsement of tradition positively correlates with their adherence to costly COVID-19-avoidance behaviors; accounting for some of the conflicts that arise between public health precautions and other objectives further strengthens this evidence that traditionalism is associated with greater attention to hazards.
(© 2023. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje