Using the Community Readiness Model and Stakeholder Engagement to Assess a Health System's Readiness to Provide LGBTQ+ Healthcare: A Pilot Study.
Autor: | Greene MZ; University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing., Herrmann MM; Humble Pie Consulting, LLC., Trimberger B; University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Research square [Res Sq] 2023 Mar 29. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Mar 29. |
DOI: | 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1902727/v1 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Despite broad social and policy changes over the past several decades, many LGBTQ+ people face barriers to healthcare and report mistreatment and disrespect in healthcare settings. Few health systems level interventions have been shown to improve sexuality- and gender-related health disparities. Using the Community Readiness Model, we developed and implemented a rigorous assessment and priority-setting intervention at one mid-sized health system in the midwestern US. We evaluated the system's readiness to provide LGBTQ+ healthcare and developed immediate action steps that are responsive to local context. We engaged diverse stakeholder groups throughout the process. Methods: Led by the Community Readiness Model, we identified key groups within the health system and conductedstructured interviews with 4-6 key informants from each group. Two trained scorers external to the study team individually scored each interview on a numerical scale ranging from 1 (no awareness of the problem) to 9 (community ownership of the problem) and discussed and reconciled scores. Group scores were averaged for each dimension of readiness and overall readiness, and then triangulated with stakeholders to ensure they reflected lived experiences. Finally, specific recommendations were generated to match the needs of the system and move them towards higher levels of readiness. Results: We convened an advisory committee of LGBTQ+ patients of the health system and a panel of local experts on LGBTQ+ wellness. Both groups contributed significantly to research processes. 28 interviews across 6 staff subcommunities indicated readiness levels ranging from "3: Vague Awareness" of the issue, and the "4: Preplanning" stage. Discrepancies across staff groups and dimensions of readiness suggested areas of focus for the health system. The evaluation process led to immediately actionable recommendations for the health system. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates the potential impact of the Community Readiness Model on improving health systems' readiness to provide LGBTQ+ healthcare. This model combines strengths from community-based research and implementation science approaches to form an intervention that can be widely disseminated and maintain the flexibility and agility to meet local needs. Future research will evaluate changes in readiness at the same health system and test the process in additional health systems. Competing Interests: Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |