Impact of insurance status on healthcare resource utilization and outcomes in adolescent patients presenting with spinal cord injuries.

Autor:	Sandhu MRS; Departments of1Neurosurgery and., David WB; 2Orthopedics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut., Reeves BC; Departments of1Neurosurgery and., Sherman JJZ; Departments of1Neurosurgery and., Craft S; Departments of1Neurosurgery and., Jayaraj C; Departments of1Neurosurgery and., Boroumand S; Departments of1Neurosurgery and., Clappier M; Departments of1Neurosurgery and., Gutierrez A; Departments of1Neurosurgery and., Sarkozy M; Departments of1Neurosurgery and., Koo AB; Departments of1Neurosurgery and., Tuason DA; 2Orthopedics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut., DiLuna ML; Departments of1Neurosurgery and., Elsamadicy AA; Departments of1Neurosurgery and.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics [J Neurosurg Pediatr] 2023 Mar 31; Vol. 32 (3), pp. 294-301. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Mar 31 (Print Publication: 2023).
DOI:	10.3171/2023.2.PEDS22506
Abstrakt:	Objective: Insurance disparities have been suggested to influence the medical and surgical outcomes of adult patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), with a paucity of studies demonstrating their impact on the outcomes of pediatric and adolescent SCI patients. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of insurance status on healthcare utilization and outcomes in adolescent patients presenting with SCI. Methods: An administrative database study was performed using the 2017 admission year from 753 facilities using the National Trauma Data Bank. Adolescent patients (11-17 years old) with cervical/thoracic SCIs were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification coding. Patients were categorized by governmental insurance versus private insurance/self-pay. Patient demographics, comorbidities, imaging, procedures, hospital adverse events (AEs), and length of stay (LOS) data were collected. Multivariate regression analyses were used to determine the effect of insurance status on LOS, any imaging or procedure, or any AE. Results: Of the 488 patients identified, 220 (45.1%) held governmental insurance while 268 (54.9%) were privately insured. Age was similar between the cohorts (p = 0.616), with the governmental insurance cohort (GI cohort) having a significantly lower proportion of non-Hispanic White patients than the private insurance cohort (PI cohort) (GI: 43.2% vs PI: 72.4%, p < 0.001). While transportation accident was the most common mechanism of injury for both cohorts, assault was significantly greater in the GI cohort (GI: 21.8% vs PI: 3.0%, p < 0.001). A significantly greater proportion of patients in the PI cohort received any imaging (GI: 65.9% vs PI: 75.0%, p = 0.028), while there were no significant differences in procedures performed (p = 0.069) or hospital AEs (p = 0.386) between the cohorts. The median (IQR) LOS (p = 0.186) and discharge disposition (p = 0.302) were similar between the cohorts. On multivariate analysis, with respect to governmental insurance, private insurance was not independently associated with obtaining any imaging (OR 1.38, p = 0.139), undergoing any procedure (OR 1.09, p = 0.721), hospital AEs (OR 1.11, p = 0.709), or LOS (adjusted risk ratio -2.56, p = 0.203). Conclusions: This study suggests that insurance status may not independently influence healthcare resource utilization and outcomes in adolescent patients presenting with SCIs. Further studies are needed to corroborate these findings.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu