The framework of Systematic Assessment for Resilience (SAR): development and validation.

Autor: Wadi MM; Medical Education Department, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia., Yusoff MSB; Medical Education Department, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia. msaiful_bahri@usm.my., Taha MH; College of Medicine and Center of Medical Education, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates., Shorbagi S; Department of Family and Community Medicine and Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates., Nik Lah NAZ; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia., Abdul Rahim AF; Medical Education Department, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: BMC medical education [BMC Med Educ] 2023 Apr 05; Vol. 23 (1), pp. 213. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Apr 05.
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04177-5
Abstrakt: Background: Burnout and depression among health professions education (HPE) students continue to rise, leading to unwanted effects that ultimately jeopardise optimal medical care and patient health. Promoting the resilience of medical students is one solution to this issue. Several interventions have been implemented to foster resilience, but they focus on aspects other than the primary cause: the assessment system. The purpose of this study is to develop a framework to promote resilience in assessment planning and practice.
Methods: We followed the guidelines suggested by Whetten for constructing a theoretical model for framework development. There were four phases in the model development. In the first phase, different literature review methods were used, and additional students' perspectives were collected through focus group discussions. Then, using the data, we constructed the theoretical model in the second phase. In the third phase, we validated the newly developed model and its related guidelines. Finally, we performed response process validation of the model with a group of medical teachers.
Results: The developed systematic assessment resilience framework (SAR) promotes four constructs: self-control, management, engagement, and growth, through five phases of assessment: assessment experience, assessment direction, assessment preparation, examiner focus, and student reflection. Each phase contains a number of practical guidelines to promote resilience. We rigorously triangulated each approach with its theoretical foundations and evaluated it on the basis of its content and process. The model showed high levels of content and face validity.
Conclusions: The SAR model offers a novel guideline for fostering resilience through assessment planning and practice. It includes a number of attainable and practical guidelines for enhancing resilience. In addition, it opens a new horizon for HPE students' future use of this framework in the new normal condition (post COVID 19).
(© 2023. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: