Women Representation in Anesthesiology Society Leadership Positions.

Autor:	Harbell MW; From the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona., McMullen KB; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona., Kosiorek H; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona., Kraus MB; From the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Anesthesia and analgesia [Anesth Analg] 2023 Dec 01; Vol. 137 (6), pp. 1171-1178. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Apr 03.
DOI:	10.1213/ANE.0000000000006465
Abstrakt:	Background: Although the number of women in medicine has increased, women remain underrepresented in leadership positions, specifically in medical societies. Specialty societies in medicine are influential in networking, career advancement, research and education opportunities, and providing awards and recognition. The goals of this study are to examine the representation of women in leadership positions in anesthesiology societies compared to women society members and women anesthesiologists and to analyze the trend in women society presidents over time. Methods: A list of anesthesiology societies was obtained from the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) website. Society leadership positions were obtained via the societies' websites. Gender was determined by images on the society website and images or pronouns on hospital websites and research databases. The percentage of women presidents, vice presidents/presidents-elect, secretaries/treasurers, board of directors/council members, and committee chairs was calculated. The percentage of women in society leadership positions was compared to the percentage of women society members when available, and the percentage of women anesthesiologists in the workforce (26%) using binomial difference of unpaired proportions tests. The trend of women presidents from 1980 to 2020 was analyzed using a Cochran-Armitage trend test. Results: A total of 13 societies were included in this study. Overall, women held 32.6% (189/580) of leadership positions. 38.5% (5/13) of presidents, 17.6% (3/17) of presidents-elect/vice presidents, and 45% (9/20) of secretaries/treasurers were women. In addition, 30.0% (91/303) of board of directors/council members and 34.2% (90/263) of committee chairs were women. The percentage of women holding society leadership positions was significantly greater than the percentage of women anesthesiologists in the workforce ( P < .001), as was the percentage of women as committee chairs ( P = .003). The percentage of women society members was available for 9 of 13 societies (69%), and the percentage of women leaders was similar to the percentage of women society members ( P = .10). There was a significant difference in the percentage of women leaders between society size categories. Small societies had 32.9% (49/149) women leaders, medium had 39.4% (74/188) women leaders, and the single large society had 27.2% (66/243) ( P = .03). There were also significantly more women leaders in the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) than there are women members ( P = .02). Conclusions: This study suggests that anesthesia societies may be more inclusive of women in leadership positions compared to other specialty societies. Although in anesthesiology, women remain underrepresented in academic leadership roles, there is a higher proportion of women in leadership roles in anesthesiology societies than proportion of women in the anesthesia workforce. Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. (Copyright © 2023 International Anesthesia Research Society.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu