Posterior Retinotomy vs Perfluorocarbon Liquid to Aid Drainage of Subretinal Fluid During Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair (PRO Study Report No. 10).
| Autor: | Vo LV; Retina Center of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA., Ryan EH; VitreoRetinal Surgery, PA, Minneapolis, MN, USA., Ryan CM; VitreoRetinal Surgery, PA, Minneapolis, MN, USA., Shah GK; The Retina Institute, St. Louis, MO, USA., Gupta OP; Mid Atlantic Retina, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Capone A Jr; Associated Retinal Consultants of Michigan, Royal Oak, MI, USA., Eliott D; Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA., Yonekawa Y; The Retina Institute, St. Louis, MO, USA., Bhavsar AR; Retina Center of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA., Emerson MV; Retina Center of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA., Jones JM; Retina Center of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA., Emerson GG; Retina Center of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Journal of vitreoretinal diseases [J Vitreoretin Dis] 2020 Aug 12; Vol. 4 (6), pp. 494-498. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 12 (Print Publication: 2020). |
| DOI: | 10.1177/2474126420941372 |
| Abstrakt: | Purpose: This work compares posterior retinotomy vs perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) for subretinal fluid (SRF) drainage during pars plana vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Methods: In this large, multicenter, retrospective comparative study, 2620 patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy (with or without scleral buckle) for uncomplicated RRD. Patients for whom SRF was drained via the primary break without retinotomy or PFCL were excluded; those who required both retinotomy and PFCL were similarly excluded. Remaining patients were separated into "retinotomy" and "PFCL" cohorts. Subgroup analysis was conducted for macula-on and macula-off subgroups. Postoperative outcomes were analyzed and compared. Results: A total of 760 eyes (82.7%) had retinotomy and 159 eyes (17.3%) had PFCL for drainage of SRF, and baseline characteristics between the 2 groups were similar. Postoperative analysis showed similar outcomes between the retinotomy and PFCL cohorts, including final visual acuity ( P = .19), redetachment rate ( P = .30), anatomic success ( P = .28), presence of postoperative epiretinal membrane ( P = .75), and other macular pathologies ( P > .99). Subgroup analysis yielded similar outcomes for macula-on and macula-off subgroups. Postoperative presence of retained PFCL was 2.4%, possibly a factor in the slightly higher number of subsequent surgical procedures ( P = .03) in the PFCL cohort. Conclusions: Postoperative outcomes for retinotomy vs PFCL during RRD repair are comparable, aside from slightly greater number of subsequent surgical procedures needed in the PFCL cohort. Our analysis suggests both techniques are reasonable tools in the repair of macula-on or macula-off RRD. Competing Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. (© The Author(s) 2020.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|