Does posterior approach always lead to poor functional and cosmetic outcomes in displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures?

Autor:	Koşucu T; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kaçkar State Hospital, Rize-Türkiye., Şimşek EK; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Başkent University Hospital, Ankara-Türkiye., Haberal B; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Başkent University Hospital, Ankara-Türkiye., Dincer R; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Süleyman Demirel University Hospital, Isparta-Türkiye., Kovalak E; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Biruni University Hospital, İstanbul-Türkiye., Baykal YB; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Süleyman Demirel University Hospital, Isparta-Türkiye.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES [Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg] 2023 Apr; Vol. 29 (4), pp. 523-529.
DOI:	10.14744/tjtes.2022.29403
Abstrakt:	Background: Supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHFs) are the most common types of elbow fractures in children. Closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) is the primary surgical treatment of SCHFs. In cases that cannot be managed with closed reduction, treatment with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is necessary. We aimed to compare CRPP and ORIF through a posterior approach regarding clinical and functional outcomes in pediatric SCHF cases. Methods: Patients with Gartland type III SCHF who underwent CRPP or ORIF with posterior approach at our clinic between January 2013 and December 2016 were included in this retrospective study. A total of 60 patients who underwent surgical treatment and had available data on our hospital database and no additional injuries were included in the study. We analyzed their data concerning age, gender, fracture type, neurovascular damage, and surgical treatment. In addition, we inspected the patients' anteroposterior and lateral radiographs at 1-year follow-up visits for Baumann (humerocapitellar) angle (BA) and carrying angle (CA) and checked their go-niometer assessments of elbow range of motion (ROM). The cosmetic and functional outcomes were determined using Flynn's criteria. Results: Demographic, preoperative, and post-operative data of 60 patients between the ages of 2-15 were analyzed. 46 of these patients had CRPP, and 14 had posterior ORIF. CA, Baumann angle, and lateral capitello-humeral angle were measured for fractured elbow and contralateral elbow and compared statistically. There was no statistically significant difference between the two surgical ap-proaches in terms of CA (p=0.288), Baumann's angle (p=0.951) and LHCA (p=0.578). At the end of 1-year follow-up, elbow ROM was measured, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.190). Furthermore, there is no statistically significant difference between the two surgical approaches in terms of both cosmetic (p=0.814) and functional (p=0.319) outcomes. Conclusion: A comprehensive literature review of pediatric SCHF shows that surgeons do not frequently prefer posterior incisions in Gartland type III fracture that cannot be managed with closed reduction. However, posterior open reduction is a safe and effective method since it provides more control over the distal humerus, allows for a complete anatomical reduction involving both cortices, reduces the risk of ulnar nerve injury, thanks to the nerve exploration, and yields positive cosmetic and functional outcomes.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu