[Poor uptake of service provision at a drug-related emergency department – a qualitative study].
Autor: | Rognli EB; Seksjon for klinisk rus- og avhengighetsforskning (RusForsk), Klinikk psykisk helse og avhengighet, Oslo universitetssykehus., Dalsrud MK; Barn av rusmisbrukere, Oslo., Wüsthoff LEC; Seksjon for klinisk rus- og avhengighetsforskning (RusForsk), Klinikk psykisk helse og avhengighet, Oslo universitetssykehus., Arnevik EA; Seksjon for klinisk rus- og avhengighetsforskning (RusForsk), Klinikk psykisk helse og avhengighet, Oslo universitetssykehus. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | norština |
Zdroj: | Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke [Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen] 2023 Mar 27; Vol. 143 (5). Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Mar 27 (Print Publication: 2023). |
DOI: | 10.4045/tidsskr.22.0471 |
Abstrakt: | Background: The patient pathway for follow-up after a drug overdose, which is an important part of Norway's national overdose strategy, started up on 1 January 2022. Four years earlier, a collaboration was initiated between the ambulance service and the drug-related emergency department at Oslo University Hospital with the same aim as this patient pathway: to provide emergency follow-up in the specialist health service after a drug overdose. Uptake of the follow-up provision was minimal, and the purpose of this study was to investigate the reasons behind this. Material and Method: We used a case study design and carried out twelve qualitative interviews with representatives from the ambulance service, the drug-related emergency department and the service user group. A thematic analysis of the interviews was then conducted. Results: The analysis revealed five thematic areas with different explanations for the poor uptake of the service provision. There was insufficient information about the provision, and the admission criteria were unclear. Communication issues between the ambulance service and the drug-related emergency department meant that the provision did not function as an emergency service. The service users' wishes after an overdose did not correspond fully with the provision, and uptake was sometimes associated with sanctions. Interpretation: The results show that things could have been done differently at a local level, but also that the content of the patient pathway is unclear, and that general guidelines can lead to the provision being perceived as unsafe. The knowledge generated from this survey can help uncover areas that require improvement at a national level in the follow-up pathway after a drug overdose. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |