| Autor: |
Benca E; Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria., Ferrante B; Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria., Unger E; Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria., Strassl A; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria., Hirtler L; Division of Anatomy, Centre for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria., Brånemark R; Department of Orthopaedics, Gothenburg University, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden.; Biomechatronics Group, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA., Windhager R; Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria., Hobusch GM; Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. |
| Abstrakt: |
Background and Objectives : The treatment of transfemoral amputees using osseointegrated implants for prosthetic anchorage requires accurate implant positioning when using threaded bone-anchoring implants due to the curvature of the femur and the risk of cortical penetration in misaligned implants. This study investigated the accuracy and precision in implant positioning using additively manufactured case-specific positioning guides. Materials and Methods : The geometry and density distribution of twenty anatomic specimens of human femora were assessed in quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scanning. The imaging series were used to create digital 3D specimen models, preoperatively plan the optimal implant position and manufacture specimen-specific positioning guides. Following the surgical bone preparation and insertion of the fixture (threaded bone-anchoring element) (OPRA; Integrum AB, Mölndal, Sweden), a second QCT imaging series and 3D model design were conducted to assess the operatively achieved implant position. The 3D models were registered and the deviations of the intraoperatively achieved implant position from the preoperatively planned implant position were analyzed as follows. The achieved, compared to the planned implant position, was presented as resulting mean hip abduction or adduction (A/A) and extension or flexion (E/F) and mean implant axis offset in medial or lateral (M/L) and anterior or posterior (A/P) direction measured at the most distal implant axis point. Results : The achieved implant position deviated from the preoperative plan by 0.33 ± 0.33° (A/A) and 0.68 ± 0.66° (E/F) and 0.62 ± 0.55 mm (M/L) and 0.68 ± 0.56 mm (A/P), respectively. Conclusions : Using case-specific guides, it was feasible to achieve not only accurate but also precise positioning of the implants compared to the preoperative plan. Thus, their design and application in the clinical routine should be considered, especially in absence of viable alternatives. |
