| Autor: |
Vaughan L; Water Research Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia., Barnett D; Intelligent Water Networks, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia., Bourke E; Intelligent Water Networks, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia., Burrows H; Central Highlands Water, Wendouree, VIC 3355, Australia., Robertson F; Central Highlands Water, Wendouree, VIC 3355, Australia., Smith B; Central Highlands Water, Wendouree, VIC 3355, Australia., Cashmore J; Central Highlands Water, Wendouree, VIC 3355, Australia., Welk M; Goulburn Valley Water, Shepparton, VIC 3355, Australia., Burch M; Australis Water Consulting, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia., Zamyadi A; Water Research Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.; Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.; Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia. |
| Abstrakt: |
Algal blooms consisting of potentially toxic cyanobacteria are a growing source water management challenge faced by water utilities globally. Commercially available sonication devices are designed to mitigate this challenge by targeting cyanobacteria-specific cellular features and aim to inhibit cyanobacterial growth within water bodies. There is limited available literature evaluating this technology; therefore, a sonication trial was conducted in a drinking water reservoir within regional Victoria, Australia across an 18-month period using one device. The trial reservoir, referred to as Reservoir C, is the final reservoir in a local network of reservoirs managed by a regional water utility. Sonicator efficacy was evaluated through qualitative and quantitative analysis of algal and cyanobacterial trends within Reservoir C and surrounding reservoirs using field data collected across three years preceding the trial and during the 18-month duration of the trial. Qualitative assessment revealed a slight increase in eukaryotic algal growth within Reservoir C following device installation, which is likely due to local environmental factors such as rainfall-driven nutrient influx. Post-sonication quantities of cyanobacteria remained relatively consistent, which may indicate that the device was able to counteract favorable phytoplankton growth conditions. Qualitative assessments also revealed minimal prevalence variations of the dominant cyanobacterial species within the reservoir following trial initiation. Since the dominant species were potential toxin producers, there is no strong evidence that sonication altered Reservoir C's water risk profiles during this trial. Statistical analysis of samples collected within the reservoir and from the intake pipe to the associated treatment plant supported qualitative observations and revealed a significant elevation in eukaryotic algal cell counts during bloom and non-bloom periods post-installation. Corresponding cyanobacteria biovolumes and cell counts revealed that no significant changes occurred, excluding a significant decrease in bloom season cell counts measured within the treatment plant intake pipe and a significant increase in non-bloom season biovolumes and cell counts as measured within the reservoir. One technical disruption occurred during the trial; however, this had no notable impacts on cyanobacterial prevalence. Acknowledging the limitations of the experimental conditions, data and observations from this trial indicate there is no strong evidence that sonication significantly reduced cyanobacteria occurrence within Reservoir C. |
