| Autor: |
Jiang J; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota., Moore R; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota., Jordan CE; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota., Guo R; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota., Maus RL; Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota., Liu H; Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota., Goode E; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota., Markovic SN; Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota., Wang C; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. |
| Abstrakt: |
Multiplex immunofluorescence (MxIF) images provide detailed information of cell composition and spatial context for biomedical research. However, compromised data quality could lead to research biases. Comprehensive image quality checking (QC) is essential for reliable downstream analysis. As a reliable and specific staining of cell nuclei, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) signals were used as references for tissue localization and auto-focusing across MxIF staining-scanning-bleaching iterations and could potentially be reused for QC. To confirm the feasibility of using DAPI as QC reference, pixel-level DAPI values were extracted to calculate signal fluctuations and tissue content similarities in staining-scanning-bleaching iterations for identifying quality issues. Concordance between automatic quantification and human experts' annotations were evaluated on a data set consisting of 348 fields of view (FOVs) with 45 immune and tumor cell markers. Cell distribution differences between subsets of QC-pass vs QC-failed FOVs were compared to investigate the downstream effects. Results showed that 87.3% FOVs with tissue damage and 73.4% of artifacts were identified. QC-failed FOVs showed elevated regional gathering in cellular feature space compared with the QC-pass FOVs. Our results supported that DAPI signals could be used as references for MxIF image QC, and low-quality FOVs identified by our method must be cautiously considered for downstream analyses. |
