Clinical Decision Support Systems for Palliative Care Management: A Scoping Review.

Autor: Santos FCD; Department of Family, Community, and Health Systems Science (F.C.D.S, U.A.S., G.M.K.), College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. Electronic address: fabianadossantos@ufl.edu., Snigurska UA; Department of Family, Community, and Health Systems Science (F.C.D.S, U.A.S., G.M.K.), College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA., Keenan GM; Department of Family, Community, and Health Systems Science (F.C.D.S, U.A.S., G.M.K.), College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA., Lucero RJ; School of Nursing (R.J.L.), University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA., Modave F; Department of MD-Anesthesiology (F.M), College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of pain and symptom management [J Pain Symptom Manage] 2023 Aug; Vol. 66 (2), pp. e205-e218. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Mar 17.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.03.006
Abstrakt: Context: With the expansion of palliative care services in clinical settings, clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have become increasingly crucial for assisting bedside nurses and other clinicians in improving the quality of care to patients with life-limiting health conditions.
Objectives: To characterize palliative care CDSSs and explore end-users' actions taken, adherence recommendations, and clinical decision time.
Methods: The CINAHL, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched from inception to September 2022. The review was developed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. Qualified studies were described in tables and assessed the level of evidence.
Results: A total of 284 abstracts were screened, and 12 studies comprised the final sample. The CDSSs selected focused on identifying patients who could benefit from palliative care based on their health status, making referrals to palliative care services, and managing medications and symptom control. Despite the variability of palliative CDSSs, all studies reported that CDSSs assisted clinicians in becoming more informed about palliative care options leading to better decisions and improved patient outcomes. Seven studies explored the impact of CDSSs on end-user adherence. Three studies revealed high adherence to recommendations while four had low adherence. Lack of feature customization and trust in guideline-based in the initial stages of feasibility and usability testing were evident, limiting the usefulness for nurses and other clinicians.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that implementing palliative care CDSSs can assist nurses and other clinicians in improving the quality of care for palliative patients. The studies' different methodological approaches and variations in palliative CDSSs made it challenging to compare and validate the applicability under which CDSSs are effective. Further research utilizing rigorous methods to evaluate the impact of clinical decision support features and guideline-based actions on clinicians' adherence and efficiency is recommended.
(Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: