[Utility of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring as a prognostic value of postoperative facial paresis in vestibular schwannomas].

Autor: Torres-Carretero L; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, España. Electronic address: ltorrescarretero@gmail.com., Otero-Rodríguez Á; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, España., Alejos-Herrera MV; Servicio de Neurofisiología, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, España., Vázquez-Casares G; Servicio de Neurofisiología, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, España., García-Martín A; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, España., Garrido-Ruiz PA; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, España.
Jazyk: Spanish; Castilian
Zdroj: Neurocirugia (English Edition) [Neurocirugia (Astur : Engl Ed)] 2023 Sep-Oct; Vol. 34 (5), pp. 238-246. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Mar 15.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucie.2022.09.004
Abstrakt: Background and Objective: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring allows us to predict the functional status of the facial nerve after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Due to the great variability of the neurophysiological protocols used for it, the goal of this study is to determine the prognostic ability of our neurophysiological protocol.
Material and Methods: We have performed a statistical analysis of the neurophysiological monitoring data collected from patients operated between March 2009 and July 2021 at the Neurosurgery Service of Salamanca according to their functional status, both in the immediate post-surgical period and one year after surgery.
Results: A number of 51 patients between 46 and 63 years old (median: 54) were analyzed. We have found significant differences studying the threshold value of the stimulation intensity of the facial nerve and the variation of the Cortico-bulbar Evoked Motor Potentials (P=0.043 and P=0.011, respectively) between the patients with good and bad clinical situation after surgery. The most discriminating intensity threshold value was 0.35mA (Sensitivity: 85%; Specificity: 48%). No statistical relationship was found in the study group one year after surgery.
Conclusions: Our intraoperative monitoring protocol allows us to predict the clinical situation of patients in the immediate postoperative period and improve information for the patient and her relatives after surgery. We cannot, however, use these parameters to predict the functional situation one year after surgery and make clinical decisions in this regard.
(Copyright © 2022 Sociedad Española de Neurocirugía. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: