Efficacy of Adjuvants in Ophthalmic Regional Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Autor: | Bodenbender JP; From the Department of Ophthalmology (J.-P.B., C.P., F.S.), University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany. Electronic address: jpbophthal@googlemail.com., Eberhart L; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (L.E., T.W., A.-K.S., H.-C.D.), University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany., Paul C; From the Department of Ophthalmology (J.-P.B., C.P., F.S.), University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany., Wiesmann T; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (L.E., T.W., A.-K.S., H.-C.D.), University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany., Schubert F; From the Department of Ophthalmology (J.-P.B., C.P., F.S.), University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany., Schubert AK; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (L.E., T.W., A.-K.S., H.-C.D.), University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany., Dinges HC; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (L.E., T.W., A.-K.S., H.-C.D.), University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | American journal of ophthalmology [Am J Ophthalmol] 2023 Aug; Vol. 252, pp. 26-44. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Mar 09. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.02.023 |
Abstrakt: | Purpose: This network meta-analysis aims to determine the differences between adjuvants that are used in combination with local anesthetics for ophthalmic regional anesthesia. Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials, comparing the impact of adjuvants in ophthalmic regional anesthesia, in Embase, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Web of Science was performed. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Frequentist network meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with saline as the comparator. Primary endpoints were the onset and the duration of sensory block and globe akinesia, as well as the duration of analgesia. Summary measure was the ratio of means (ROM). Secondary endpoints were the rates of side effects and adverse events. Results: A total of 39 trials were identified as eligible for network meta-analysis, including 3046 patients. In all, 17 adjuvants were compared in the most extensive network (onset of globe akinesia). The addition of fentanyl (F), clonidine (C), or dexmedetomidine (D) showed the best overall results. Onset of sensory block was as follows: F 0.58 (CI = 0.47-0.72), C 0.75 (0.63-0.88), D 0.71 (0.61-0.84); onset of globe akinesia: F 0.71 (0.61-0.82), C 0.70 (0.61-0.82), D 0.81 (0.71-0.92); duration of sensory block: F 1.20 (1.14-1.26), C 1.22 (1.18-1.27), D 1.44 (1.34-1.55); duration of globe akinesia: F 1.38 (1.22-1.57), C 1.45 (1.26-1.67), D 1.41 (1.24-1.59); and duration of analgesia: F 1.46 (1.33-1.60), C 1.78 (1.63-1.96), D 1.41 (1.28-1.56). Conclusions: The addition of fentanyl, clonidine, or dexmedetomidine showed beneficial effects regarding onset and duration of sensory block and globe akinesia. (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |