General histological woes: Encore. Tissues, please.

Autor: Neumann PE; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Department of Medical Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada., Neumann EE; College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) [Clin Anat] 2023 Jul; Vol. 36 (5), pp. 782-786. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Mar 16.
DOI: 10.1002/ca.24031
Abstrakt: In a previous essay, we wrote about the shortcomings of the four basic tissue dogma of histology - miscellaneous tissues lumped under the ill-fitting name "connective tissues" and the existence of human tissues that are not recognized as subtypes of any of the four "basic types". A provisional reclassification of human tissues was constructed to improve the precision and completeness of the tissue taxonomy. Here, we address criticisms from a recent paper that claims that the four basic tissue dogma is more useful than that revised classification in medical education and in clinical practice. Some of the criticism appears to arise from the common misconception of a tissue as simply an array of similar cells.
(© 2023 The Authors. Clinical Anatomy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Clinical Anatomists and British Association of Clinical Anatomists.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: