The Association of Radiation Dose With Overall Survival for Patients Treated With Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Autor:	Waters MR; Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA., Andruska N; Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA., Fischer-Valuck BW; Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA., Agabalogun T; Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Loui, USA., Brenneman RJ; Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA., Gay H; Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA., Michalski JM; Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA., Baumann B; Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Cureus [Cureus] 2023 Jan 29; Vol. 15 (1), pp. e34351. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jan 29 (Print Publication: 2023).
DOI:	10.7759/cureus.34351
Abstrakt:	Introduction Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa) has demonstrated excellent biochemical recurrence-free survival, with studies showing improved BRFS with higher-dose SBRT. However, current studies have been underpowered to evaluate the relationship of SBRT dose to overall survival (OS). In this retrospective study using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we hypothesize that, given the low alpha/beta ratio of PCa, a relatively small increase in the dose-per-fraction would be associated with improved survival outcomes for intermediate-risk PCa (IR-PCa) comparing 36.25 Gy/5 fx [biologically equivalent dose (BEDα/β = 1.5 = 211.46 Gy vs. 35 Gy (BED1.5 = 198.33 Gy)]. Materials and methods We queried records from the NCDB from 2005 to 2015 for men receiving prostate SBRT for IR-PCa (n=2673). 82% were treated using either 35 Gy/5 fx or 36.25 Gy/5 fx. We compared OS in men receiving 35 Gy versus 36.25 Gy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for covariable imbalances. Unweighted- and weighted-multivariable analysis (MVA) using Cox regression was used to compare OS hazard ratios, accounting for age, race, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, treatment facility type, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), clinical T-stage, Gleason Score, and use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed. Results Seven hundred and eighty men (35%) were treated with 35 Gy/5 fx and 1434 men (65%) were treated with 36.25 Gy/5 fx (n=2214). Compared to 35 Gy, treatment with 36.25 Gy was associated with significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61 [95% CI: 0.43-0.89], P= 0 . 009) on MVA. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, 36.25 Gy was associated with improved survival (p=0.034), with a five-year OS of 92% and 88%, respectively. Conclusions In a multi-institutional retrospective database of 2,214 IR patients treated with prostate SBRT, a prescription dose of 36.25 Gy/5 fx was associated with improved OS vs. 35 Gy/5 fx. Results are hypothesis-generating but do lend support to the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines that the minimum recommended dose for prostate SBRT is 36.25 Gy/5 fx. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. (Copyright © 2023, Waters et al.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu