Clinical validation of a contactless respiration rate monitor.

Autor: Bujan B; Klinik Lengg AG, Neurorehabilitation Center, Bleulerstrasse 60, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. bartosz.bujan@kliniklengg.ch., Fischer T; Essen University Hospital, Ruhrlandklinik, Tueschener Weg 40, 45239, Essen, Germany., Dietz-Terjung S; Essen University Hospital, Ruhrlandklinik, Tueschener Weg 40, 45239, Essen, Germany., Bauerfeind A; Klinik Lengg AG, Swiss Epilepsy Center, Bleulerstrasse 60, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland., Jedrysiak P; Essen University Hospital, Neurorehabilitation Center, Bleulerstrasse 60, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland., Große Sundrup M; Essen University Hospital, Ruhrlandklinik, Tueschener Weg 40, 45239, Essen, Germany., Hamann J; Klinik Lengg AG, Swiss Epilepsy Center, Bleulerstrasse 60, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland., Schöbel C; Essen University Hospital, Ruhrlandklinik, Tueschener Weg 40, 45239, Essen, Germany.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2023 Mar 01; Vol. 13 (1), pp. 3480. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Mar 01.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30171-4
Abstrakt: Respiratory rate (RR) is an often underestimated and underreported vital sign with tremendous clinical value. As a predictor of cardiopulmonary arrest, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation or indicator of health state for example in COVID-19 patients, respiratory rate could be especially valuable in remote long-term patient monitoring, which is challenging to implement. Contactless devices for home use aim to overcome these challenges. In this study, the contactless Sleepiz One+ respiration monitor for home use during sleep was validated against the thoracic effort belt. The agreement of instantaneous breathing rate and breathing rate statistics between the Sleepiz One+ device and the thoracic effort belt was initially evaluated during a 20-min sleep window under controlled conditions (no body movement) on a cohort of 19 participants and secondly in a more natural setting (uncontrolled for body movement) during a whole night on a cohort of 139 participants. Excellent agreement was shown for instantaneous breathing rate to be within 3 breaths per minute (Brpm) compared to thoracic effort band with an accuracy of 100% and mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.39 Brpm for the setting controlled for movement, and an accuracy of 99.5% with a MAE of 0.48 Brpm for the whole night measurement, respectively. Excellent agreement was also achieved for the respiratory rate statistics over the whole night with absolute errors of 0.43, 0.39 and 0.67 Brpm for the 10th, 50th and 90th percentiles, respectively. Based on these results we conclude that the Sleepiz One+ can estimate instantaneous respiratory rate and its summary statistics at high accuracy in a clinical setting. Further studies are required to evaluate the performance in the home environment, however, it is expected that the performance is at similar level, as the measurement conditions for the Sleepiz One+ device are better at home than in a clinical setting.
(© 2023. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje