How are Research for Development Programmes Implementing and Evaluating Equitable Partnerships to Address Power Asymmetries?

Autor: Snijder M; Tomorrow's Cities Urban Disaster Risk Hub, Institute of Development Studies, Falmer, Brighton, UK., Steege R; Tomorrow's Cities Urban Disaster Risk Hub, Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales Sede (FLACSO), Quito, Ecuador., Callander M; Gender and Justice Security Hub, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK., Wahome M; One Ocean Hub, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK., Rahman MF; Living Deltas Hub, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK., Apgar M; Tomorrow's Cities Urban Disaster Risk Hub, Institute of Development Studies, Falmer, Brighton, UK., Theobald S; Tomorrow's Cities Urban Disaster Risk Hub, Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales Sede (FLACSO), Quito, Ecuador., Bracken LJ; Living Deltas Hub, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK., Dean L; Tomorrow's Cities Urban Disaster Risk Hub, Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales Sede (FLACSO), Quito, Ecuador., Mansaray B; ARISE Hub, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, Freetown, Sierra Leone., Saligram P; ARISE Hub, George Institute for Global Health India, New Delhi, India., Garimella S; ARISE Hub, George Institute for Global Health India, New Delhi, India., Arthurs-Hartnett S; Tomorrow's Cities Urban Disaster Risk Hub, Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales Sede (FLACSO), Quito, Ecuador., Karuga R; ARISE Hub, LVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya., Mejía Artieda AE; ARISE Hub, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK., Chengo V; Tomorrow's Cities Urban Disaster Risk Hub, Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales Sede (FLACSO), Quito, Ecuador., Ateles J; Tomorrow's Cities Urban Disaster Risk Hub, African Centre for Technology Studies (ACTs), Nairobi, Kenya.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The European journal of development research [Eur J Dev Res] 2023; Vol. 35 (2), pp. 351-379. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Feb 23.
DOI: 10.1057/s41287-023-00578-w
Abstrakt: The complexity of issues addressed by research for development (R4D) requires collaborations between partners from a range of disciplines and cultural contexts. Power asymmetries within such partnerships may obstruct the fair distribution of resources, responsibilities and benefits across all partners. This paper presents a cross-case analysis of five R4D partnership evaluations, their methods and how they unearthed and addressed power asymmetries. It contributes to the field of R4D partnership evaluations by detailing approaches and methods employed to evaluate these partnerships. Theory-based evaluations deepened understandings of how equitable partnerships contribute to R4D generating impact and centring the relational side of R4D. Participatory approaches that involved all partners in developing and evaluating partnership principles ensured contextually appropriate definitions and a focus on what partners value.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s41287-023-00578-w.
(© The Author(s) 2023.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: