Psychometric Properties of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory in a Sample of Medical Students in Kazakhstan.

Autor: Bolatov AK; Astana Medical University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan., Seisembekov TZ; Astana Medical University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan., Askarova AZ; Astana Medical University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan., Igenbayeva B; Astana Medical University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan., Smailova DS; Kazakhstan's School of Public Health, Almaty, Kazakhstan., Hosseini H; University of Scranton, Scranton, PA, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Psychology in Russia : state of the art [Psychol Russ] 2021 Jun 30; Vol. 14 (2), pp. 15-24. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jun 30 (Print Publication: 2021).
DOI: 10.11621/pir.2021.0202
Abstrakt: Background: The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) has demonstrated good psychometric properties among different populations, but there is no known data on its validity among Russian-speaking medical students. The CBI-Student Survey focuses only on fatigue, but measures exhaustion in four different life domains: Personal Burnout (PB), Studies-Related Burnout (SRB), Colleague-Related Burnout (CRB), and Teacher-Related Burnout (TRB).
Objective: To investigate the psychometric properties of the Russian version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (R-CBI-S).
Design: A cross-sectional study was carried out among 771 medical students at Astana Medical University (Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan). Statistical analyses included test-retest reliability, internal consistency, item analysis, convergent and concurrent validity, and confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was evaluated by bivariate correlations of R-CBI-S with anxiety, depression, and satisfaction with the study.
Results: Test-retest reliability showed an ICC of 0.81. All item-total correlations for the total scale were positive (range 0.31-0.76). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.94 (0.896 for PB, 0.884 for SRB, 0.874 for CRB, and 0.926 for TRB). The Barlett's sphericity test result was significant (p < 0.001), and the KMO measure of sampling adequacy exceeded 0.947. Convergent validity analysis results: PB (AVE = 0.52, CR = 0.87), SRB (AVE = 0.50, CR = 0.87), CRB (AVE = 0.51, CR = 0.86), TRB (AVE = 0.56, CR = 0.88). The R-CBI-S achieved good levels of goodness-of-fit indices (RMSEA = 0.0611; CFI= 0.940; TLI = 0.933).
Conclusion: The test results indicated that the R-CBI-S scale appears to be a reliable and valid instrument. The R-CBI-S may be a useful tool in future research to identify burnout factors based on specific life domains for developing effective prevention measures among medical students.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
(© Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2021© Russian Psychological Society, 2021.)
Databáze: MEDLINE