Understanding the uptake of diagnostics for sustainable gastrointestinal nematode control by European dairy cattle farmers: a multi-country cross-sectional study.

Autor: Vande Velde F; Laboratory for Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium - Department of Public Health Science, Faculty of Landscape and Society, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Fredrik A. Dahls vei 15, 1430 Ås, Norway., Hektoen L; Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1 Veterinærbygningen, Elizabeth Stephansens vei 15, 1430 Ås, Norway., Phythian CJ; Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1 Veterinærbygningen, Elizabeth Stephansens vei 15, 1430 Ås, Norway., Rinaldi L; Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR, Via Federico Delpino 1, 80137 Naples, Italy., Bosco A; Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR, Via Federico Delpino 1, 80137 Naples, Italy., Hinney B; Institute of Parasitology, Department of Pathobiology, Vetmeduni, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria., Gehringer M; LKV Lower Austria, Pater Werner Deibl-Straße 4, 3910 Zwettl, Austria., Strube C; Institute for Parasitology, Centre for Infection Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Buenteweg 17, 30559 Hanover, Germany., May K; Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University of Gießen, Frankfurter Str. 94, 35392 Giessen, Germany., Knubben-Schweizer G; Clinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory and Herd Health Services, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Sonnenstrasse 16, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany., Martins OMD; Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal., Mateus TL; CISAS - Center for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability, Escola Superior Agrária, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Àlvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal - Veterinary and Animal Research Centre (CECAV), UTAD, Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AL4AnimalS) Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal., Simion VE; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Spiru Haret University, Bdul Basarabia 256, Sector 3, 030352, Romania., Charlier J; Kreavet, Hendrik Mertensstraat 17, 9150 Kruibeke, Belgium., Bartley DJ; The Moredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Penicuik, EH26 0PZ, United Kingdom., Claerebout E; Laboratory for Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Parasite (Paris, France) [Parasite] 2023; Vol. 30, pp. 4. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Feb 10.
DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2023002
Abstrakt: To mitigate emerging anthelmintic resistance (AR) in cattle, sustainable gastrointestinal nematode control strategies should be adopted. A multi-centre study was set up to understand the factors affecting European dairy cattle farmers' adoption of diagnostics and to gauge for differences between regions. The data were collected through a multi-lingual survey by participating countries of the European Co-operation in Science and Technology (COST) action COMbatting Anthelmintic Resistance in ruminants (COMBAR). Four countries provided sufficient data to be included in the data analysis: Norway, Italy, Germany and Austria. Three models were estimated and validated through structural equation modelling. Norway, along with Germany and Austria (pooled dataset) showed similar trends that align with previous studies. AR risk perception had no influence on the adoption intention of diagnostics, a positive influence was found for attitude towards diagnostics and subjective norms (i.e., perceived opinion of others), and a negative influence of attitudes towards anthelminthics. Additionally, routine (i.e., perception of the current treatment) had an indirect effect on adoption intention through attitudes. Italy's data deviated from these findings, presenting a positive effect of the perceived severity of AR, and perceived behavioural control (i.e., perceived ability to perform a specific behaviour) on adoption intention of diagnostics. Finally, Norway's data set allowed for inclusion of a measurement of current behaviour in the model, identifying a direct positive effect of the perceived actual behaviour of other farmers on their own behaviour.
(© F. Vande Velde et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2023.)
Databáze: MEDLINE