Comparative Study of CO 2 LASER Assisted and Electrocautery Assisted Tonsillectomy with Conventional Tonsillectomy.

Autor: Bhankhodia BP; Department of E.N.T., Medical College Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India., Aiyer RG; Department of E.N.T., Medical College Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India., Raval JB; Department of E.N.T., Medical College Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India [Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg] 2022 Dec; Vol. 74 (Suppl 3), pp. 5324-5328. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Feb 20.
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-021-02381-7
Abstrakt: Tonsillectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed since many years. Various methods of tonsillectomy (Electrocautery, LASER, Harmonic scalpel, Coblation) have been practiced over the last century aiming for reducing intra and postoperative morbidity. We carried out prospective randomized control study using retrospective data as secondary data to compare blood loss, excision and hemostasis time, pain, recovery time and complication between CO 2 LASER and Electrocautery assisted with conventional method. Average time for surgery with CO 2 LASER (82.17 min) was more than conventional (77.77 min) and electrocautery (21.40 min) was least. The postoperative pain and recovery time was more in CO 2 LASER and Electrocautery group than conventional. The blood loss was more in conventional group compared to other two group. We concluded that CO 2 LASER group has longest operative time but least blood loss. Postoperative pain was more and lasted longer in Electrocautery group. Conventional method had least recovery time, least tissue reaction and least hospital stay.
Competing Interests: Conflict of interestAll the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in the submission of this manuscript.
(© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2021.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje