Prevalence of Periapical Radiolucency and Conventional Root Canal Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies.

Autor:	Alaidarous FA; General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU., Alamoudi RA; General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU., Baeisa DS; General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU., Alghamdi FT; Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Cureus [Cureus] 2023 Jan 03; Vol. 15 (1), pp. e33302. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jan 03 (Print Publication: 2023).
DOI:	10.7759/cureus.33302
Abstrakt:	Cross-sectional studies assess a population's health state and the prevalence of diseases or treatments. Few systematic reviews regarding the prevalence of periapical radiolucency (PARL) and nonsurgical root canal treatment (NSRCT) were conducted in the last decade. The goal of this study was to collect and review all updated and available cross-sectional studies that focus on the prevalence of both PARL and NSRCT in adult populations. It involves a systematic literature review of cross-sectional studies on the prevalence of PARL and NSRCT published from 1987 to 2022 in PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus with specific keywords used in the search process. A total of 52 articles were included in this systematic review. The majority of the included articles were from different populations. The overall prevalence of teeth with PARL was 43,522 (6.40%), while the prevalence of NSRCT teeth was 52,149 (7.67%). On the other hand, the overall prevalence of PARL in teeth that have received endodontic treatment and teeth that have not received endodontic treatment were 22,110 (3.25%) and 21,412 (3.15%), respectively. A meta-analysis was not performed due to underreporting of publication bias and the high degree of heterogeneity between studies. The overall risk of bias assessment revealed a low risk of bias in 25 (48%) of the included studies. The prevalence of NSRCT was higher at 7.67%, followed by PARL at approximately 6.40%. However, future studies are recommended to investigate the prevalence of both PARL and NSRCT in different patient populations. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. (Copyright © 2023, Alaidarous et al.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu