| Autor: |
Pelka EZ; Department of Kinesiology, Nutrition and Health, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.; Exercise Science and Exercise Physiology Program, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA., Gadola C; Department of Kinesiology, Nutrition and Health, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA., McLaughlin D; Department of Kinesiology, Nutrition and Health, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA., Slattery E; Department of Kinesiology, Nutrition and Health, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA., Claytor RP; Department of Kinesiology, Nutrition and Health, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
The purpose of this investigation was to compare concentric movement velocity (CMV) measured with the PUSH Band (v2.0) and a Vicon motion capture system (MC) during the back squat (SQ) and the bench press (BP) resistance exercises (RE). Twelve resistance-trained males (26.0 ± 5.5 years; 175.6 ± 4.9 cm; 96.3 ± 15.8 kg) completed ten repetitions at 50% of one-repetition maximum (1RM), and six repetitions at 75% 1RM for both BP and SQ. Four PUSH devices were utilized and attached to the subject’s right forearm, the center barbell, left and right sides of the barbell. MC markers were placed on top of each PUSH device. An overall analysis using a series of least-squares means contrasts suggested CMV did not differ (p > 0.05) between measurement technologies when position, RE, intensity and repetitions were combined. PUSH exhibited the highest Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC = 0.835−0.961) and Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficients (r = 0.742−0.949) at the arm and center barbell locations when compared with MC. The measurement of CMV between MC and PUSH compares favorably during moderate (i.e., 50%) and high (75%) intensity SQ and BP RE. These data indicate individuals can use the PUSH band v2.0 to accurately monitor CMV within a RE set for SQ and BP RE. |
