| Autor: |
Hanoon ZA; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kufa, Najaf 54001, Iraq., Abdullah HA; Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Tikrit University, Tikrit 34001, Iraq., Al-Ibraheemi ZA; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kufa, Najaf 54001, Iraq., Alamoush RA; Prosthodontic Department, School of Dentistry, University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan., Sami SM; Maxillofacial Surgery Department, College of Dentistry, University of Kufa, Najaf 54001, Iraq., Haider J; Department of Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UK. |
| Abstrakt: |
Objective : The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cervical marginal fit of porcelain laminate veneer (PLV) restorations made from two different types of CAD/CAM ceramic laminates: CEREC C PC and E.max (LD). Materials and Methods : This in-vitro experiment used a total of 32 human maxillary first premolars that were clean and free of any cracks or caries, extracted for orthodontic purposes. The samples were divided in a random way into two study groups: A and B ( n = 16). Each sample was mounted on a dental surveyor and a silicon impression was made to create a silicone index for each tooth in both groups. Standardized preparation was carried out for all the samples by using preparation bur kit for the ceramic veneer system. Subsequently, digital impressions were made for all the samples by using Trios 3 shape intraoral camera (Sirona Dental Systems). The design of veneer restorations was made using Sirona inLab CAD SW 16.1 with CEREC inLab MC XL (Dentsply, Sirona Dental Systems, Bensheim, Germany). The veneer restorations were cemented using 3M RelyX veneer resin cement (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and the samples kept in distilled water for two weeks at 37 °C. All the specimens were subjected to thermocycling in a water bath with temperature varying between 5 °C and 55 °C for 500 cycles. The cervical marginal fit of veneers was evaluated by a digital microscope after sectioning the embedded teeth in acrylic resin. Results : The lowest mean of cervical marginal gap was recorded for Group A (91.59431 ± 1.626069) which was restored with CEREC CAD/CAM veneers, while the highest mean value of the gap was recorded for Group B (106.48863 ± 2.506684) which was restored with IPS E.max CAD. The t -test showed that the type of porcelain veneer restoration had a highly significant effect on the cervical marginal fit ( p ≤ 0.01). Conclusions : CEREC CAD/CAM veneers showed smaller cervical marginal gaps, indicating a better fit compared to the IPS E.max CAD. |
