| Autor: |
Hong S; Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA. gmpourmp@pitt.edu., Mallette AJ; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA., Neeway JJ; Energy and Environment Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA., Motkuri RK; Energy and Environment Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA., Rimer JD; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA., Mpourmpakis G; Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA. gmpourmp@pitt.edu. |
| Abstrakt: |
The mechanisms of many zeolitic processes, including nucleation and interzeolite transformation, are not fully understood owing to complex growth mixtures that obfuscate in situ monitoring of molecular events. In this work, we provide insights into zeolite chemistry by investigating the formation thermodynamics of small zeolitic species using first principles calculations. We systematically study how formation energies of pure-silicate and aluminosilicate species differ by structure type and size, temperature, and the presence of alkali or alkaline earth metal cations (Na + , K + , and Ca 2+ ). Highly condensed (cage-like) species are found to be strongly preferred to simple rings in the pure-silicate system, and this thermodynamic preference increases with temperature. Introducing aluminum leads to more favorable formation thermodynamics for all species. Moreover, for species with a low Si/Al ratio (≤2), a thermodynamic preference does not exist among structure types; instead, a pool of diverse aluminosilicate structures compete in formation. Metal cation effects strongly depend on the presence of aluminum, cage size, cation type, and location, since each of these factors can alter electrostatic interactions between cations and zeolitic species. We reveal that confined metal cations may destabilize pure-silicate cages due to localized interactions; conversely, they stabilize aluminosilicates due to strong cation-framework attractions in sufficiently large cages. Importantly, this work rationalizes a series of experimental observations and can potentially guide efforts for controlling zeolite nucleation/crystallization processes. |
