| Autor: |
Gandrieau J; University of Lille, University of Artois, University Littoral Côte d'Opale., Schnitzler C; Université de Strasbourg., Cairney J; University of Queensland., Keegan R; University of Canberra., Roberts WM; University of Gloucestershire.; University of Waikato., Barnett LM; Deakin University., Bentsen P; Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg., Dudley DA; University of Queensland.; Macquarie University., Raymond Sum KW; The Chinese University of Hong Kong., Venetsanou F; National and Kapodistrian University of Athens., Button C; University of Otago., Turcotte S; Université de Sherbrooke., Berrigan F; Université de Sherbrooke., Cloes M; Unité de Recherche Interfacultaire Santé Société., Rudd JR; Liverpool John Moores University.; Victoria University., Riga V; University of Patras., Mouton A; Unité de Recherche Interfacultaire Santé Société., Vašíčková J; Palacký University Olomouc., Blanchard J; Université de Sherbrooke.; Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke., Mekkaoui L; University of Lille, University of Artois, University Littoral Côte d'Opale., Derigny T; University of Lille, University of Artois, University Littoral Côte d'Opale., Franck N; Unité de Recherche Interfacultaire Santé Société., Repond RM; Bern University of Applied Sciences., Markovič M; Sports Union of Slovenia., Scheuer C; Institute for Teaching and Learning., Potdevin F; University of Lille, University of Artois, University Littoral Côte d'Opale. |
| Abstrakt: |
Purpose: Following increased interest in physical literacy (PL), development of appropriate tools for assessment has become an important next step for its operationalization. To forward the development of such tools, the objective of this study was to build the foundations of the Évaluation de la Littératie Physique (ELIP), designed to help reduce existing tensions in approaches to PL assessment that may be resulting in a low uptake into applied settings. Methods: We followed two steps: (1) the development of the first version of ELIP by deploying a Delphi method ( n = 30); and (2) the modification of items through cognitive interviews with emerging adults ( n = 32). Results: The expert consensus highlighted four dimensions of PL to be assessed-physical; affective; cognitive; and social-with new perspectives, including a preference for broad motor tests over fitness. Conclusion: Results offer new insights into the assessment of emerging adults' PL, but ELIP still requires further work concerning validity, reliability, and sensitivity. |
