A Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Synthetic Allograft, and Bioresorbable Xenograft During Immediate Implant Placement.
Autor: | Tomar N; Department of Public Health Dentistry, People's Dental Academy, Bhopal, IND., Dahiya S; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Maharishi Markandeshwar College of Dental Sciences and Research (MMCDSR), Mullana, IND., Sharma PK; Department of Oral Surgery, Government Dental College, Dibrugarh, IND., Sabu K I; Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, PSM College of Dental Science and Research, Thrissur, IND., Singh Parihar A; Department of Periodontics, People's Dental Academy, Bhopal, IND., Mandal A; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kusum Devi Sunderlal Dugar Jain Dental College, Kolkata, IND., Sahoo AR; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Awadh Dental College and Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Cureus [Cureus] 2022 Dec 01; Vol. 14 (12), pp. e32121. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Dec 01 (Print Publication: 2022). |
DOI: | 10.7759/cureus.32121 |
Abstrakt: | Background: The use of an appropriate graft material helps in an adequate amount of osseointegration. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a synthetic allograft (PerioGlas), and Bio-Oss, a bioresorbable xenograft in immediate implant procedures. Methods: In this randomized, prospective study, 90 patients were categorized into three groups with 30 samples in each as Group A: patients who received PRP with an immediate implant; Group B: immediate implants with synthetic allograft (PerioGlas); and Group C: patients with immediate implants placed using bioresorbable xenograft (Bio-Oss). Postoperative follow-up was done based on plaque and gingival index, measurement of probing depths, and resorption of bone. Obtained data were statistically analyzed using the "one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)" test. Results: Inter-group statistical comparisons between gingival and plaque indices at three, six, and 12 months of follow-up in the study groups demonstrated no statistical significance (p > 0.05). The mean probing depths and resorption of bone at three, six, and 12 months of follow-up were statistically nonsignificant (p > 0.05) on the inter-group comparison. Conclusion: It could be concluded from the present study that there is no statistical superiority observed among PRP, PerioGlas, or Bio-Oss in terms of their usage as a graft material along with immediate implant placement procedure. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. (Copyright © 2022, Tomar et al.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |