Autor: |
Hannawa AF; Center for the Advancement of Healthcare Quality & Safety (CAHQS), Faculty of Communication, Culture & Society, Università della Svizzera italiana (USI)., Stojanov A; Higher Education Development Centre, University of Otago. |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Zdroj: |
Health communication [Health Commun] 2024 Apr; Vol. 39 (1), pp. 148-160. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Dec 28. |
DOI: |
10.1080/10410236.2022.2162224 |
Abstrakt: |
This study investigates whether people's responses to official communications about COVID-19 could be "profiled" with respect to socio-economic-demographic and behavioral characteristics. Such profiles could enhance the effectiveness of future crisis management through the use of profile-adapted communications that maximize message comprehension. A representative web panel survey (742 respondents) was conducted across Switzerland in February 2022 to assess the population's reaction to COVID-19 communications during the pandemic. Latent profile analysis was conducted to explore if distinct profiles of reactions to the communications would emerge, and how each of them relate to conspiracy mentality and SED measures. The analyses revealed three latent profiles: "Compliant supporters" (54%), "defiant deniers" (23.6%), and "anxious skeptics" (22.4%). Respondents with high conspiracy mentality were more likely to belong to "defiant deniers" or "anxious skeptics." Each profile was characterized by distinct SED and behavioral features (discussed in the paper). The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated that one communication does not work for all people. Our study evidenced three different types of respondent profiles that require profile-adapted communications for more effective crisis control. Our study is the first to profile people's responses to COVID-19 communications in a systematic, person-centered way. The results can be used for more effective future crisis management that delivers to each profile's communicative needs. |
Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |
|