Comparative validity of three simulation platforms for objective assessment of otoscopy skills.
Autor: | Rotimi O; ENT Department, Brighton and Sussex University Hospital Trust, Brighton, UK., Haymes A; ENT Department, Brighton and Sussex University Hospital Trust, Brighton, UK., Dodds I; ENT Department, Brighton and Sussex University Hospital Trust, Brighton, UK., Bhutta M; ENT Department, Brighton and Sussex University Hospital Trust, Brighton, UK.; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery [Clin Otolaryngol] 2023 May; Vol. 48 (3), pp. 423-429. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jan 20. |
DOI: | 10.1111/coa.14015 |
Abstrakt: | Objectives: To assess the face, construct and content validity of three different platforms for otoscopy skills assessment, using a traditional otoscope with manikin, digital otoscope (Tympahealth) with manikin, and traditional otoscope with a low-cost model ear (SimEar). Design: Prospective mixed methods study. Setting: Tertiary hospital. Participants: Postgraduate trainees and expert assessors. Main Outcome Measures: Face and Content validity based on expert assessor ranking on each model and their feedback from semi-structured interviews. Construct validity based on Objective Structured Clinical Examination scores. Results: Each platform differed in face, construct and content validity scores, with no one platform consistently outperforming others. Three main themes were identified during thematic analysis of expert assessor interviews: ability to assess what is seen, anatomical reality, and ease of use. The low-cost model showed greatest potential, where modification to include a silicone ear could lead to high validity with marginal increase in cost. Conclusion: Several modalities for assessing otoscopy skills exist, each with advantages and disadvantages. Modifications to a low-cost model, for use with either a traditional or digital otoscope, could prove to be the best model. (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |