Textbook outcome in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: systematic review.

Autor:	Pretzsch E; Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany., Koliogiannis D; Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany., D'Haese JG; Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany., Ilmer M; Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany., Guba MO; Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany., Angele MK; Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany., Werner J; Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany., Niess H; Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	BJS open [BJS Open] 2022 Nov 02; Vol. 6 (6).
DOI:	10.1093/bjsopen/zrac149
Abstrakt:	Background: Textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure reflecting the ideal outcome after surgery. As a benchmarking tool, it provides an objective overview of quality of care. Uniform definitions of TO in hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery are missing. This study aimed to provide a definition of TO in HPB surgery and identify obstacles and predictors for achieving it. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 1993 and 2021 were retrieved. After selection, two independent reviewers extracted descriptive statistics and derived summary estimates of the occurrence of TO criteria and obstacles for achieving TO using co-occurrence maps. Results: Overall, 30 studies were included. TO rates ranged between 16-69 per cent. Commonly chosen co-occurring criteria to define TO included 'no prolonged length of stay (LOS)', 'no complications', 'no readmission', and 'no deaths'. Major obstacles for achieving TO in HPB surgery were prolonged LOS, complications, and readmission. On multivariable analysis, TO predicted better overall and disease-free survival in patients with cancer. Achievement of TO was more likely in dedicated centres and associated with procedural and structural indicators, including high case-mix index and surgical volume. Conclusion: TO is a useful quality measure to benchmark surgical outcome. Future definitions of TO in HPB surgery should include 'no prolonged LOS', 'no complications', 'no readmission', and 'no deaths'. (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu