Application of PGF 2α at the moment of fixed-time artificial insemination in crossbred beef cows.

Autor: Marques JCDS; Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.; Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada., Cadima GP; Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil., Faria ACF; Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil., Guimarães EA; Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil., Oliveira FS; Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil., Dos Santos RM; Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Animal reproduction [Anim Reprod] 2022 Nov 04; Vol. 19 (4), pp. e20220012. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Nov 04 (Print Publication: 2022).
DOI: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2022-0012
Abstrakt: Although studies have shown positive effects of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) or prostaglandin F (PGF ) at the moment of fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) in the conception rate (CR) of cattle, its effects on treatments based on progesterone (P4) and estradiol benzoate (EB) is still not conclusive. The objective of this study was (1) to evaluate the effect of a PGF analogue at FTAI in the CR of crossbred beef cows submitted to a 11d FTAI protocol based on P4 and EB; and (2) to describe the CR between PGF -treated and control cows in different body condition scores (BCS) and parity categories. Crossbred (½ Nellore and ½ Angus) beef cows were submitted to a synchronization protocol and randomly assigned into 2 groups: Control (n = 163), at FTAI cows received 2 mL of saline solution as a placebo, and PGF (n = 163), at FTAI cows were treated with PGF analogue (10 mg of dinoprost tromethamine). Pregnancy diagnosis was performed 33d post-FTAI. Binary logistic regression model was used to analyze the effect of PGF treatment on CR. There was no difference in CR between PGF and control groups ( P > 0.05; odds ratio (OR) = 0.92; confidence interval (CI) = 0.59-1.4). A greater CR was found in heifers ( P = 0.0006, OR = 2.65, CI = 1.61 - 4.38) and multiparous ( P = 0.0006, OR = 2.12, CI = 1.04 - 4.3) when compared to primiparous cows. Cows with low BCS (4; 9-point scale) showed lower CR when compared with moderate BCS (5-6; 9-point scale) ( P < 0.05; OR = 0.10; CI = 0.06 - 0.18). There was no numerical difference on CR between PGF -treated and control cows in different BCS and parity categories. The results suggested that the CR in this study was not influenced by 10 mg PGF analogue at FTAI.
Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Databáze: MEDLINE