Women Versus Females: Gender Essentialism in Everyday Language.
Autor: | Troncoso SC; Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. troncoso@umich.edu.; Department of Women's and Gender Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. troncoso@umich.edu., Schudson ZC; Department of Psychology, California State University, Sacramento, USA., Gelman SA; Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Journal of psycholinguistic research [J Psycholinguist Res] 2023 Jun; Vol. 52 (3), pp. 975-995. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Nov 09. |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10936-022-09917-0 |
Abstrakt: | How do different words referring to gender/sex categories reflect and/or shape our understanding of gender/sex concepts? The current study examined this issue by assessing how individuals use gender/sex terms (females, males, women, men). Participants recruited through MTurk (N = 299) completed an online survey, rating the terms on nine dimensions, completing a fill-in-the-blank task, and reporting gender essentialist beliefs. Overall, participants rated the words females/males as more biological and technical, and women/men as higher on all other dimensions (e.g., appropriate, polite, warm). Preference for females/males correlated positively with gender essentialism among women. These findings suggest that use of certain gendered terms is linked to how people conceptualize gender/sex. Future research should further explore the relation between choice of gendered terms, how language choice reflects and shapes attitudes and beliefs about gender/sex, and factors (e.g., race) that may influence this relation. (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |