Incidence risks for subtypes of heart diseases in a Russian cohort of Mayak Production Association nuclear workers.

Autor: Azizova TV; Clinical Department, Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI), Ozyorsk, Chelyabinsk Region, Russia. clinic@subi.su., Bannikova MV; Clinical Department, Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI), Ozyorsk, Chelyabinsk Region, Russia., Briks KV; Clinical Department, Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI), Ozyorsk, Chelyabinsk Region, Russia., Grigoryeva ES; Clinical Department, Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI), Ozyorsk, Chelyabinsk Region, Russia., Hamada N; Biology and Environmental Chemistry Division, Sustainable System Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), Tokyo, Japan.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Radiation and environmental biophysics [Radiat Environ Biophys] 2023 Mar; Vol. 62 (1), pp. 51-71. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Nov 03.
DOI: 10.1007/s00411-022-01005-0
Abstrakt: Heart diseases are one of the main causes of death. The incidence risks were assessed for various types of heart diseases (HDs) in a cohort of Russian nuclear workers of the Mayak Production Association (PA) who had been chronically occupationally exposed to external gamma and/ or internal alpha radiation. The study cohort included all workers (22,377 individuals) who had been hired at the Mayak PA during 1948-1982 and followed up until 31 December 2018. The mean gamma-absorbed dose to the liver (standard deviation) was 0.43 (0.63) Gy, and the mean alpha-absorbed dose to the liver was 0.25 (1.19) Gy. Excess relative risk (ERR) per unit liver-absorbed dose (Gy) was calculated based on maximum likelihood. At the end of the follow-up, 559 chronic rheumatic heart disease (CRHD), 7722 ischemic heart disease (IHD) [including 2185 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and 3976 angina pectoris (AP)], 4939 heart failure (HF), and 3689 cardiac arrhythmia and conduction disorder (CACD) cases were verified in the study cohort. Linear model fits of the gamma dose response for HDs were best once adjustments for non-radiation factors (sex, attained age, calendar period, smoking status and alcohol consumption) and alpha dose were included. ERR/Gy in males and females was 0.17 (95% confidence intervals: 0.10, 0.26) and 0.23 (0.09, 0.38) for IHD; 0.18 (0.09, 0.29) and 0.26 (0.08, 0.49) for AP; - 0.01 (n/a, 0.1) and - 0.01 (n/a, 0.27) for AMI; 0.27 (0.16, 0.40) and 0.27 (0.10, 0.49) for HF; 0.32 (0.19, 0.46) and 0.05 (- 0.09, 0.22) for CACD; 0.73 (- 0.02, 2.40) and - 0.12 (- 0.50, 0.69) for CRHD, respectively. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the persistence of a significant dose-response regardless of exclusion/inclusion of adjustments for known potential non-radiation confounders (smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus), and it was only the magnitude of the risk estimate that varied. The risks of HD incidence were not modified with sex (except for the CACD risk). This study provides evidence for a significant association of certain types of HDs with cumulative dose of occupational chronic external exposure to gamma radiation.
(© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: