Propensity-score matched comparison between minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement.
Autor: | Gašparović H; Hrvoje Gašparović, Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia, hgasparovic@gmail.com., Čerina P, Tokić T, Urlić M, Golubić Ćepulić B, Kopjar T, Burcar I, Biočina B |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Croatian medical journal [Croat Med J] 2022 Oct 31; Vol. 63 (5), pp. 423-430. |
Abstrakt: | Aim: To evaluate the impact of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (mini-AVR) on clinical outcomes in comparison with the gold standard. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who underwent isolated AVR at the University Hospital Center Zagreb from 2010 to 2020. Patients undergoing mini-AVR were compared with patients undergoing conventional AVR (fs-AVR). The primary outcome measure was blood product consumption. Propensity score matching was used to create a balanced covariate distribution across treatment groups. Additionally, we compared the contemporary outcomes with a historical control. Results: The final sample consisted of 1088 patients. In the unmatched cohorts, mini-AVR patients were younger (65±12 vs 68±10 years, P<0.001) and had lower risk profiles (EuroSCORE2 2.8±2.0 vs 3.5±3.1, P=0.003). After matching, mini-AVR patients required less blood transfusion than fs-AVR patients (270 [0-790] vs 510 [0-970] mL, P=0.029). The incidences of stroke, dialysis, new AV block, and mortality were comparable. Cross-clamp times were longer in the mini-AVR group (71 [60-87] vs 66 [53-83] minutes, P=0.013). Outcomes were improved in the contemporary mini-AVR era compared with our early mini-AVR experience across multiple metrics. Blood product consumption was reduced in the latter tercile of experience (0 [0-520] vs 500 [0-1018] mL, P<0.001), and the operation was performed more expeditiously (cross-clamp times: 63 [54,80] vs 74 [62,88] minutes, P<0.001) in comparison with earlier periods. Conclusions: We showed that mini-AVR was associated with less blood product requirement than conventional surgery. Our data supports wider adoption of minimally invasive techniques in dedicated centers of excellence. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |