Cascade of decisions meet personal preferences in sciatica treatment decisions.

Autor:	van Dijk W; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands wieteke.vandijk@radboudumc.nl., Tanke MAC; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands., Meinders MJ; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands., Verkerk EW; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands., Jeurissen PPT; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands., Westert GP; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	BMJ open quality [BMJ Open Qual] 2022 Nov; Vol. 11 (4).
DOI:	10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001694
Abstrakt:	Study Design: An in-depth interview study including patients, general practitioners, neurologists and neurosurgeons. Objective: To gain insight in decision-making in sciatica care, by identifying patients' and physicians' preferences for treatment options, and the differences between and within both groups. Summary of Background Data: Sciatica is a self-limiting condition, which can be treated both conservatively and surgically. The value of both options has been disputed, and the care pathway is known for a substantial amount of practice variation. Most Dutch patients are taken care of by general practitioners before they are referred to hospital-based neurologists, who might refer to a neurosurgeon, who can perform a surgical intervention. Dutch sciatica care thus follows the principles of stepped care, and a cascade of decisions precedes surgery. Better understanding of the decision-making within this cascade might reveal opportunities to improve shared decision-making and to reduce unwarranted practice variation. Methods: Interviews with 10 patients and 22 physicians were analysed thematically. Results: While physicians were confident of their clinical diagnosis, patients preferred confirmation trough imaging to exclude other possible explanations. Furthermore, many patients showed reluctance towards the use of (strong) opioids, while all physicians favoured this and underlined the benefits of opioids in the management of sciatica complaints, to buy time and to allow patients to recover naturally. Finally, individual physicians differed strongly in their opinion on benefits and optimal timing of surgical treatment and epidural injections. Conclusions: Dutch sciatica care is characterised by a cascade of decisions preceding surgery. Preferences differ within and between patients and physicians, which adds to the practice variation. To improve decision-making, physicians and patients should invest not necessarily more in the exchange of options or preferences, but in making sure the other understands the rationale behind them. Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared. (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu