Breaking the constraint on the number of cervical vertebrae in mammals: On homeotic transformations in lorises and pottos.

Autor: Galis F; Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.; Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands., Van Dooren TJM; Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.; CNRS, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences iEES Paris, Sorbonne University Paris, Paris, France., van der Geer AAE; Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Evolution & development [Evol Dev] 2022 Nov; Vol. 24 (6), pp. 196-210. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Oct 31.
DOI: 10.1111/ede.12424
Abstrakt: Mammals almost always have seven cervical vertebrae. The strong evolutionary constraint on changes in this number has been broken in sloths and manatees. We have proposed that the extremely low activity and metabolic rates of these species relax the stabilizing selection against changes in the cervical count. Our hypothesis is that strong stabilizing selection in other mammals is largely indirect and due to associated pleiotropic effects, including juvenile cancers. Additional direct selection can occur due to biomechanical problems (thoracic outlet syndrome). Low metabolic and activity rates are thought to diminish these direct and indirect effects. To test this hypothesis within the primates, we have compared the number of cervical vertebrae of three lorisid species with particularly low activity and metabolic rates with those of more active primate species, including with their phylogenetically closest active relatives, the galagids (bushbabies). In support of our hypothesis, we found that 37.6% of the lorisid specimens had an abnormal cervical count, which is a higher percentage than in the other nine primate families, in which the incidence varied from zero to 2.2%. We conclude that our data support the importance of internal selection in constraining evolvability and of a relaxed stabilizing selection for increasing evolvability. Additionally, we discuss that there is no support for a role of the muscularized diaphragm in the evolutionary constraint.
(© 2022 The Authors. Evolution & Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje