Quality of early prostate cancer follow-up care from the patients' perspective.
Autor: | Wollersheim BM; Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. b.wollersheim@nki.nl., van der Poel HG; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., van Asselt KM; Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Pos FJ; Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Tillier CN; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Akdemir E; Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Vis AN; Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Lampe MI; Department of Urology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, 8934 AD, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands., van den Bergh R; Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands., Somford DM; Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands., Knipscheer B; Department of Urology, Scheper Hospital, Boemarkeweg 60, 7824 AA, Emmen, The Netherlands., Cauberg ECC; Department of Urology, Isala Hospital, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands., Noordzij A; Department of Urology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Spaarnepoort 1, 2134 TM, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands., Aaronson NK; Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Boekhout AH; Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., van de Poll-Franse LV; Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.; Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB, Tilburg, The Netherlands. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer [Support Care Cancer] 2022 Dec; Vol. 30 (12), pp. 10077-10087. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Oct 28. |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00520-022-07396-6 |
Abstrakt: | Purpose: To develop optimal cancer survivorship care programs, this study assessed the quality of prostate cancer follow-up care as experienced by patients shortly after completion of primary treatment. Methods: We surveyed 402 patients with localized prostate cancer participating in a randomized controlled trial comparing specialist versus primary care-based follow-up. For the current study, we used patient-reported data at the time of the first follow-up visit at the hospital, prior to randomization. We assessed patients' ratings of the quality of follow-up care using the Assessment of Patient Experiences of Cancer Care survey. This survey includes 13 scales about different aspects of care and an overall rating of care. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with perceived follow-up quality. Results: Patients reported positive experiences at first follow-up for 9 of 13 scales, with mean (M) scores ranging from 79 to 97 (on a 0-100 response scale). Patients reported most frequently (over 70%) suboptimal care regarding symptom management (84%; M = 44, SD = 37), health promotion (75%; M = 45, SD = 39), and physician's knowledge about patients' life (84%; M = 65, SD = 23). Overall, patients' lower quality of follow-up ratings were associated with younger age, higher education level, having more than one comorbid condition, having undergone primary surgery, and experiencing significant symptoms. Conclusion: Patients with prostate cancer are generally positive about their initial, hospital-based follow-up care. However, efforts should be made to improve symptom management, health promotion, and physician's knowledge about patients' life. These findings point to areas where prostate cancer follow-up care can be improved. (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |