| Autor: |
Bergfeldt L; Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.; Region Västra Götaland, Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden., Noor Baloch A; School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden., Lundahl G; Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden., Gransberg L; Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden., Bergström G; Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.; Region Västra Götaland, Department of Clinical Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. |
| Abstrakt: |
There are numerous sex-related differences in cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmia propensity but very little knowledge about the reasons. Difference in body size has been proposed as one reason and was tested in this study of >20 cardiac electrophysiology parameters in 319 (158 women) apparently healthy 50- to 64-yr-old subjects from a randomly enrolled population sample, the pilot SCAPIS (Swedish Cardiopulmonary Bioimaging Study), using Frank vectorcardiography. We studied conventional conduction intervals, parameters reflecting electrical heterogeneity (dispersion) in the ventricles, QRS- and T-vector directions, spatial QRS-T angles, and T-vector loop morphology. Body surface area (BSA; 2 methods) and lean body mass (LBM), both estimated from body weight and height, were used as body size parameters. According to multivariable linear regression analysis adjusted for sex, there was no association between electrophysiological parameters and body size apart from QRS duration and QRSarea. In conclusion, most electrophysiological parameters assessed completely noninvasively and showing statistically significant differences between women and men on the group level show no association with BSA or LBM. Scaling (indexing) the electrophysiological parameters for body size parameters is therefore not an option. Consequently, the explanation for the sex-related electrophysiological differences should be sought along other lines. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We sought explanations for sex-related differences in >20 cardiac electrophysiology parameters including conventional conduction intervals in 319 (158 women) apparently healthy 50- to 64-yr-old subjects using Frank vectorcardiography, a novelty. Our hypothesis that body size was partly explanatory for such differences had to be refuted apart from QRS duration and QRSarea. Scaling (indexing) electrophysiological parameters for body size is therefore not an option and explanations for electrophysiological sex-related differences are to be sought elsewhere. |
