Comparing net returns in the feedlot: Bos Taurus vs. Bos Indicus influenced steers with varying anabolic implant intensity.

Autor:	Feuz R; Applied Economics Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA., Reichhardt CC; Department of Human Nutrition, Food and Animal Sciences, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA., Larsen R; Applied Economics Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA., Thornton KJ; Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Science Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA., Garcia MD; Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Science Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Translational animal science [Transl Anim Sci] 2022 Aug 21; Vol. 6 (3), pp. txac111. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Aug 21 (Print Publication: 2022).
DOI:	10.1093/tas/txac111
Abstrakt:	There are two main beef cattle breed types: Bos Taurus (BT) and Bos Indicus (BI). Past research has demonstrated various expected differences in growth, temperament, feeding behavior, and carcass characteristics between these breed types when administered varying levels of anabolic implant. However, little is known about the differences in expected economic returns between these cattle types. The objective of this research is to simulate and compare the expected net returns of BT, Angus (AN) steers and BI influenced, Santa Gertrudis (SG) steers, with moderate or high intensity levels of implants relative to a control with no implant. The animal performance and carcass data for this economic analysis was provided from a recent feeding experiment of AN and SG influenced steers. In the experiment, sixty steers were stratified by weight and breed in a 2 × 3 factorial design examining the two different breeds: AN ( N = 38) or SG influenced ( N = 22), and three implant strategies: no implant ( N = 20), a moderate intensity implant protocol (d0 implant: Revalor-G, d56 implant: Revalor-IS, d112 implant: Revalor-S; n=20), or a high intensity implant protocol (d0 implant: Revalor-IS, d56 implant: Revalor-S, d112 implant: Revalor-200; N = 20). The steers performance and carcass data were used together with publicly available price and input costs data in the simulation of net returns per animal for each of the treatment groups. Results demonstrated that both moderate and high intensity implanted BT steers have higher expected net return (US$78.70/hd. and US$75.84/hd., respectively) compared to BI moderate and high intensity implanted steers (US$47.03/hd. and $6.98/hd., respectively). Stochastic efficiency analysis with respect to a function demonstrated when certainty equivalent values are constrained to those ≥US$0, only the moderate implanted BT steers would be included in the efficient set. (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu