| Autor: |
Vázquez E; Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, University of California, Riverside, California, USA., Nieri T; Sociology, University of California, Riverside, California, USA., Fernandes F; Office of the Chancellor, University of California, Riverside, California, USA., Cravalho D; Office of the Chancellor, University of California, Riverside, California, USA., Ryan-Shirey F; Office of the Chancellor, University of California, Riverside, California, USA., Molina L; Solid Ground Wellness, Riverside, California, USA., Pemberton SM; Office of the Chancellor, University of California, Riverside, California, USA., Cheney AM; Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, University of California, Riverside, California, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
Objective: To discuss the engagement of patients and stakeholders (ie, faculty, staff, healthcare providers, and university administrators) in capacity building activities to prepare for future patient-centered research on collegiate recovery. Participants: 502 attended capacity building activities and provided input on priorities for future research in collegiate recovery and 77 participated in the deliberative democracy forum process. Methods: We used surveys and the deliberative democracy forum method, which includes framing sessions and forums for data collection. This method enables individuals with diverse backgrounds to share and learn about differing viewpoints to build consensus for decision making. Results: Forum participants prioritized barriers to recovery for future research and discussed the need to address diversity in collegiate recovery programs, including racial/ethnic diversity in the student recovery population and diversity in pathways to recovery, to decrease barriers to recovery. Conclusions: Institutional support for research on collegiate recovery is critical to move the field forward. |
