Surgical site infection metrics: Dissecting the differences between the National Health and Safety Network and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Autor: | Christensen AMM; Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts., Dowler K; Perioperative Services, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts., Doron S; Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE [Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol] 2021 Jul 26; Vol. 1 (1), pp. e16. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 26 (Print Publication: 2021). |
DOI: | 10.1017/ash.2021.176 |
Abstrakt: | Surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with readmissions, reoperations, increased cost of care, and overall morbidity and mortality risk. The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) have developed an array of metrics to monitor hospital-acquired complications. The only metric collected by both is SSI, but performance as benchmarked against peer hospitals is often discordant between the 2 systems. In this commentary, we outline the differences between these 2 surveillance systems as they relate to this potential for discordance. Competing Interests: All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article. (© The Author(s) 2021.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |