| Autor: |
Lee WF; School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.; School of Dental Technology, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan., Takahashi H; Course for Oral Engineering, Faculty of Dentistry, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan., Huang SY; School of Dental Technology, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan., Zhang JZ; School of Dental Technology, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan., Teng NC; School of Dental Technology, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan., Peng PW; School of Dental Technology, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan. |
| Abstrakt: |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of at-home and in-office bleaching agents on esthetic CAD-CAM materials after red wine immersion by measuring their optical properties. Sixty specimens were prepared out of three esthetic CAD-CAM materials: Vita Enamic, Celtra Duo, and Ceresmart (n = 20). All specimens were immersed in a red wine solution, and color measurements were performed. Specimens were randomly divided (n = 10) according to the bleaching procedure (in office, at home), bleaching durations were set to 3 time points, and color measurements were performed. According to the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE) L* a* b* parameters, CIEDE2000 color differences (ΔE00), translucency parameters (TP00), and whiteness index values (ΔWID) after wine staining and after bleaching were calculated. Data were analyzed using the Mann−Whitney U-test, the Kruskal−Wallis test, and a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (α = 0.05). ΔE00, ΔTP00, and ΔWID decreased with an increase in bleaching treatment. ΔE00 after the final bleaching treatment of in-office bleaching ranged from 1.7 to 2.0, whereas those of in-office treatment ranged from 0.4 to 1.1. All ΔTP00 and ΔWID after the final treatment were below the 50:50% perceptibility thresholds (ΔTP00 < 0.6, and ΔWID < 0.7). Significant differences in ΔE00, ΔTP00, and ΔWID among esthetic CAD-CAM materials were found between CD and CE. In the present study, color recovery after at-home and in-office bleaching appeared to be material-dependent. In-office bleaching showed more effective recovery comparing to at-home bleaching. |
