Predictors for cervical kyphotic deformity following laminoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Autor:	Pettersson SD; 1Neurosurgery Department, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland., Skrzypkowska P; 1Neurosurgery Department, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland., Ali S; 2Neurology Department, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida; and., Szmuda T; 1Neurosurgery Department, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland., Krakowiak M; 1Neurosurgery Department, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland., Počivavšek T; 1Neurosurgery Department, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland., Sunesson F; 1Neurosurgery Department, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland., Fercho J; 1Neurosurgery Department, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland., Miękisiak G; 3Institute of Medicine, Opole University, Opole, Poland.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of neurosurgery. Spine [J Neurosurg Spine] 2022 Sep 02; Vol. 38 (1), pp. 4-13. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Sep 02 (Print Publication: 2023).
DOI:	10.3171/2022.4.SPINE22182
Abstrakt:	Objective: Laminoplasty is a common treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). However, approximately 21% of patients undergoing laminoplasty develop cervical kyphotic deformity (KD). Because of the high prevalence rate of KD, several studies have sought to identify predictors for this complication, but the findings remain highly inconsistent. Therefore, the authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to establish reliable preoperative predictors of KD. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were used to systematically extract potential references. The first phase of screening required the studies to be written in the English language, involve patients treated for CSM and/or OPLL via laminoplasty, and report postoperative cervical KD. The second phase required the studies to provide more than 10 patients and include a control group. The mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous parameters. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. CSM and OPLL patients were further assessed by performing subgroup analyses. Results: Thirteen studies comprising patients who developed cervical KD (n = 296) and no KD (n = 1254) after receiving cervical laminoplasty for CSM or OPLL were included in the meta-analysis. All studies were retrospective cohorts and were rated as high quality. In the combined univariate analysis of CSM and OPLL patients undergoing laminoplasty, statistically significant predictors for postoperative KD included age (MD 2.22, 95% CI 0.16-4.27, p = 0.03), preoperative BMI (MD 0.85, 95% CI 0.06-1.63, p = 0.04), preoperative C2-7 range of flexion (MD 10.42, 95% Cl 4.24-16.59, p = 0.0009), preoperative C2-7 range of extension (MD -4.59, 95% CI -6.34 to -2.83, p < 0.00001), and preoperative center of gravity of the head to the C7 sagittal vertical axis (MD 26.83, 95% CI 9.13-44.52, p = 0.003). Additionally, among CSM patients, males were identified as having a greater risk for postoperative KD (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.02-2.93, p = 0.04). Conclusions: The findings from this study currently provide the largest and most reliable review on preoperative predictors for cervical KD after laminoplasty. Given that several of the included studies identified optimal cutoff points for the variables that are significantly associated with KD, further investigation into the development of a preoperative risk scoring system that can accurately predict KD in the clinical setting is encouraged. PROSPERO registration no.: CRD42022299795 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/).
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu