The economics of sediment quality on barrier shoreline restoration.

Autor: Caffey RH; Center for Natural Resource Economics & Policy, Department of Agricultural Economics Louisiana State University, USA. Electronic address: rcaffey@agcenter.lsu.edu., Petrolia DR; Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University, USA., Georgiou IY; Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Pontchartrain Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of New Orleans, USA; Water Institute of the Gulf, USA., Miner MD; Water Institute of the Gulf, USA., Wang H; Center for Natural Resource Economics & Policy, Department of Agricultural Economics Louisiana State University, USA., Kime B; Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Pontchartrain Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of New Orleans, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of environmental management [J Environ Manage] 2022 Oct 01; Vol. 319, pp. 115730. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jul 20.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115730
Abstrakt: This paper depicts a simulation-based assessment of sediment quality on the performance of dedicated dredging projects for barrier island restoration in coastal Louisiana, USA. The research involved the development and integration of two sub-models. In the first, geomorphic modeling was used to simulate sediment transport dynamics within a proxy barrier island template over a 50-year trajectory. The template was assumed to be nourished with one of two sources of dredged material: nearshore (NS) sediments of lower quality (smaller grain diameter, higher organic fines); or higher quality sediments from distal sources located on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). In the second model, agency project records and commercial bids were used to estimate project construction costs as a function of dredge material quantity, transport distance, and project target elevation. These sub-models were coupled within a net present value framework from which average annual break-even values for ecosystem services (EBEV) were derived as an efficiency metric for comparing the economic performance of NS- and OCS-sourced projects. Results indicate that in some cases, the physical resiliency afforded by even small increases in sand diameter (+4 μm d50) can translate to greater long-term economic viability (lower EBEV) for OCS-sourced sediment transported over longer distances. Moreover, projects constructed with much higher diameter OCS sediment (+44 μm d50) with low fines and transported over relatively long distances (200 μm, 5% fines, 15-20 miles) were found to be more cost-effective than all comparably-sized projects constructed with lower quality NS sediments obtained from proximal sources (156 μm, 20% fines, 3-5 miles). For some comparisons, this quality advantage yielded a lower EBEV for OCS-sourced projects with transport distances exceeding 30 miles. Under storm-punctuated simulations, these quality advantages were more pronounced, with greater physical and economic implications for earlier (Y 5 ) versus later (Y 20 ) occurring storms. Budgeting for dedicated dredging projects has traditionally centered on the value of sediment as a commodity, with a focus on material placement cost. The findings of this study, however, indicate that a more comprehensive accounting of sediment quality and performance is required to maximize the economic efficiency of coastal restoration spending.
(Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: