Autor: |
Pinho S; Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.; São João University Hospital Center, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal., Cruz M; Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal., Dias CC; CINTESIS@RISE, MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.; Knowledge Management Unit and Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal., Castro-Lopes JM; Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal., Sampaio R; Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.; CINTESIS@RISE, MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal. |
Abstrakt: |
Vaccine hesitation is a topic of utmost importance, with the COVID-19 pandemic serving as a clear reminder of its timeliness. Besides evaluating COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in a sample of Portuguese people, this study aims at understanding cognitive and emotional representations related to vaccination, and their influence on vaccination hesitation. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between 27 December 2020 and 27 January 2021. It assessed cognitive and emotional COVID-19 representations; vaccination status; cognitive and emotional representations of vaccination and perceived necessity and concerns about vaccines. Of 31 × 58 participants, 91% accepted taking a COVID-19 vaccine. Among several other significant findings, women (71.3%) more often considered that the pandemic affected their lives (p < 0.001) and were more often concerned with being infected (p < 0.001). Likewise, there were significantly more female participants concerned about taking a COVID-19 vaccine and its possible effects, when compared to the number of male participants (p < 0.001). The number of participants with a higher education level that were more worried about becoming infected was greater (p = 0.001), when compared with those less educated. Regarding age groups, people aged 18 to 24 had fewer concerned participants (9.6%), while the number of individuals aged 55 to 64 had the most (p < 0.001). Somewhat surprisingly, perceiving oneself as extremely informed about COVID-19 was not associated with greater vaccine acceptance (OR = 1.534 [1.160−2.029]; (p = 0.003)). Moreover, people aged 25 to 64 years old and with lower education level were more likely not to accept vaccination (OR = 2.799 [1.085−7.221]; (p = 0.033)). Finally, being more concerned about taking a vaccine lowers its acceptance (OR = 4.001 [2.518−6.356]; (p < 0.001)). Cognitive and emotional representations have a great impact and are reliable predictors of vaccine acceptance. Thus, it is of extreme importance that public health messages be adapted to the different characteristics of the population. |