Public sector implementation strategies to approach the judicialization of health care: a systematic review protocol.

Autor: Yamauti SM; Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Science, University of Sorocaba, Rodovia Raposo Tavares, Km 92,5 -, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil., Barreto JOM; Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Fiocruz, Brasília, DF, Brazil., Barberato-Filho S; Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Science, University of Sorocaba, Rodovia Raposo Tavares, Km 92,5 -, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil., Machado FLDS; Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, Macaé, Brazil., Lopes LC; Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Science, University of Sorocaba, Rodovia Raposo Tavares, Km 92,5 -, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil. luciane.lopes@prof.uniso.br.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Systematic reviews [Syst Rev] 2022 Aug 10; Vol. 11 (1), pp. 164. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Aug 10.
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02043-x
Abstrakt: Background: The judicialization of health care can be understood as a societal response to pressing healthcare needs, which probably are not being adequately addressed by the current healthcare system. This phenomenon increases the strain on service resources, both in the health sector and in the judiciary system as well, demanding an institutional reorganization to manage judicial actions. It is believed that each institution has developed strategies for coping with the problem in isolation and with little public disclosure. The purpose of this review will be to identify institutional strategies implemented and to investigate their effects in approaching the judicialization of health care.
Methods: Electronic searches will be conducted up to December 2021 on 11 databases, supplemented with gray literature and references lists of secondary studies. The descriptor "judicialization of health" will be the basis for conducting the main research. Studies describing any strategy implemented by public institutions to approach the judicialization of health care will be included. Results related to the quality of services provided by the implemented strategy reported in the studies and those that report accessibility, usability, and potential adverse effects or harms caused by the implemented strategy will be investigated. In addition, it will be explored if there have been changes related to the value or characteristics of health litigation. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, abstract data, and full-text papers. The risk of bias in each study will be appraised using a tool suggested by Cochrane Effective Practice and Care Organization Group (EPOC). Subsequently, the reviewers will also extract the data of interest and classify the findings of these studies according to their performance at the institutional level. The results obtained will be described as a narrative synthesis.
Discussion: This review may provide evidence on the effects of the strategies implemented to approach the judicialization of health care. It will potentially benefit health care and legal professionals, decision-makers, and researchers by identifying the types and characteristics of strategies that have the potential to improve service delivery in the future.
Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020160608.
(© 2022. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje