The role of context in identifying linkages between SDG 2 (food) and SDG 6 (water).

Autor: Su H; Multidisciplinary Water Management Group, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Horst Complex Z223, P.O Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands., Krol MS; Multidisciplinary Water Management Group, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Horst Complex Z223, P.O Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands., Hogeboom RJ; Multidisciplinary Water Management Group, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Horst Complex Z223, P.O Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.; Water Footprint Network, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Sustainability science [Sustain Sci] 2022; Vol. 17 (4), pp. 1605-1618. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 May 30.
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-022-01158-3
Abstrakt: The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nation's Agenda 2030 are formulated to promote the development of integrated, multisectoral policies that explicitly consider linkages across SDGs. Although multiple recent studies have tried to identify linkages across SDGs, the role of contextual factors in identifying SDG linkages is neither well described nor understood. For the case of SDG 2 and SDG 6, this study aims to (i) identify linkages-at country and SDG target level-through the application of various quantitative and qualitative identification methods, and (ii) explore contextual factors to explain the differences across identified linkages. Hereto, we first conducted a text analysis of 195 Voluntary National Reviews (VNRs) reported by 159 countries from 2016 to 2020. Next, we synthesized linkages reported by previous qualitative studies and conducted a quantitative (correlation) analysis on the UN's SDG database. Last, we compared identified linkages across methods, paying special attention to the role of context. From the text analysis, we identified 221 country-specific linkages between 25 SDG target pairs and observed that countries increasingly report SDG linkages in their VNRs over time. Comparing text analysis, existing qualitative studies, and our quantitative correlation analysis, we found substantial differences between the number and nature of linkages identified. These differences can be explained in part by methodological considerations, but to a significant extent also by contextual factors, such as project design, technology application, phase of interventions, and project scale. We conclude by discussing the strengths and limitations of the methods involved, and suggestions for future studies.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11625-022-01158-3.
(© The Author(s) 2022.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: