Organisation, influence, and impact of patient advisory boards in rehabilitation institutions-an explorative cross-sectional study.

Autor: Sagen J; Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs plass, P.O. Box 4, NO-0130, Oslo, Norway. Joachim.Sagen@diakonsyk.no., Børøsund E; Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway., Simonsen AE; Røysumtunet Rehabilitation Center, Jaren, Norway., Habberstad A; The Norwegian Federation of Organisations of Disabled People, Oslo, Norway., Kjeken I; Norwegian National Advisory Unit On Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Oslo, Norway., Dagfinrud H; Norwegian National Advisory Unit On Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Oslo, Norway., Moe RH; Norwegian National Advisory Unit On Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Oslo, Norway.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: BMC musculoskeletal disorders [BMC Musculoskelet Disord] 2022 Aug 02; Vol. 23 (1), pp. 738. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Aug 02.
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05678-y
Abstrakt: Background: Patient participation is highlighted as an important facilitator for patient-centered care. Patient participation organised as patient advisory boards (PABs) is an integral part of health care institutions in Norway. More knowledge is needed on how PAB representatives experience patient engagement (PE) with regard to organisation, influence, and impact. The objective was to describe how PAB representatives experience their tasks, roles, and impact on decision-making processes and service delivery in the setting of rehabilitation institutions.
Methods: PAB representatives recruited from rehabilitation institutions completed the Norwegian version of the generic Public and Patient Engagement evaluation tool (Norwegian abbreviation EBNOR). EBNOR is tested for reliability and validity with good results and comprises 35 items within four main domains, policies and practices, participatory culture, collaboration, and influence and impact that provide responses about PE-levels. The domain items are scored from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree" on a five-point scale, in addition to a don't know category. Items in the domain "influence and impact" are scored from "never" to "all of the time" on a four-point scale. Categorical data were summarized using frequencies and percentages, and response categories were collapsed into three PE-levels: barrier, intermediate, and facilitating level. Free-text responses were analysed according to principles of manifest content analysis, summed up, and used to elaborate the results of the scores.
Results: Of the 150 contacted PAB representatives, 47 (32%) consented to participate. The results showed that approximately 75% agreed that the organisation as a whole was strengthened as a result of patient participation. Four out of five domains were scored indicating a facilitating level; policies and practices (53%), participatory culture (53%), collaboration and common purpose (37%), and final thoughts (63%). The modal score in the domain influence and impact was in the intermediate PE-level (44%). Of a total of 34 codes from free text analyses, barriers to PE were coded 26 times, and PE facilitators were coded 8 times.
Conclusions: The findings indicate that most PAB representatives are satisfied with how rehabilitation institutions organise their PAB, but they still experience their impact as limited.
(© 2022. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje