| Autor: |
Franco Meléndez K; Center for Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, the Biodesign Institute, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA.; School of Life Sciences, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA.; Biodesign Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA., Crenshaw K; Center for Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, the Biodesign Institute, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA.; School of Life Sciences, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA., Barrila J; Center for Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, the Biodesign Institute, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA.; Biodesign Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA., Yang J; Center for Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, the Biodesign Institute, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA.; Biodesign Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA., Gangaraju S; Biodesign Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA., Davis RR; Center for Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, the Biodesign Institute, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA.; Biodesign Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA., Forsyth RJ; Center for Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, the Biodesign Institute, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA.; Biodesign Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA., Ott CM; Biomedical Research and Environmental Sciences Division, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA., Kader R; Center for Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, the Biodesign Institute, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA., Curtiss R 3rd; Center for Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, the Biodesign Institute, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA., Roland K; Biodesign Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA., Nickerson CA; Center for Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, the Biodesign Institute, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA.; School of Life Sciences, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA.; Biodesign Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Arizona State Universitygrid.215654.1, Tempe, Arizona, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
The discovery that biomechanical forces regulate microbial virulence was established with the finding that physiological low fluid shear (LFS) forces altered gene expression, stress responses, and virulence of the enteric pathogen Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium during the log phase. These log phase LFS-induced phenotypes were independent of the master stress response regulator, RpoS (σ S ). Given the central importance of RpoS in regulating stationary-phase stress responses of S. Typhimurium cultured under conventional shake flask and static conditions, we examined its role in stationary-phase cultures grown under physiological LFS. We constructed an isogenic rpoS mutant derivative of wild-type S. Typhimurium and compared the ability of these strains to survive in vitro pathogenesis-related stresses that mimic those encountered in the infected host and environment. We also compared the ability of these strains to colonize (adhere, invade, and survive within) human intestinal epithelial cell cultures. Unexpectedly, LFS-induced resistance of stationary-phase S. Typhimurium cultures to acid and bile salts stresses did not rely on RpoS. Likewise, RpoS was dispensable for stationary-phase LFS cultures to adhere to and survive within intestinal epithelial cells. In contrast, the resistance of these cultures to challenges of oxidative and thermal stresses, and their invasion into intestinal epithelial cells was influenced by RpoS. These findings expand our mechanistic understanding of how physiological fluid shear forces modulate stationary-phase S. Typhimurium physiology in unexpected ways and provide clues into microbial mechanobiology and nuances of Salmonella responses to microenvironmental niches in the infected host. IMPORTANCE Bacterial pathogens respond dynamically to a variety of stresses in the infected host, including physical forces of fluid flow (fluid shear) across their surfaces. While pathogens experience wide fluctuations in fluid shear during infection, little is known about how these forces regulate microbial pathogenesis. This is especially important for stationary-phase bacterial growth, which is a critical period to understand microbial resistance, survival, and infection potential, and is regulated in many bacteria by the general stationary-phase stress response protein RpoS. Here, we showed that, unlike conventional culture conditions, several stationary-phase Salmonella pathogenic stress responses were not impacted by RpoS when bacteria were cultured under fluid shear conditions relevant to those encountered in the intestine of the infected host. These findings offer new insight into how physiological fluid shear forces encountered by Salmonella during infection might impact pathogenic responses in unexpected ways that are relevant to their disease-causing ability. |
